Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGCX vs RGAHX
LFGCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts LFGCX vs RGAHX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth C
Price$38.95
Change-$1.29 (-3.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets173.12M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$86.13
Change-$1.92 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
LFGCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGCX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. LFGCX (173M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than LFGCX: RGAHX (0.44) vs LFGCX (0.00). LFGCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: LFGCX (7 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). LFGCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). LFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LFGCX: RGAHX (250) vs LFGCX (1500). LFGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.05 vs. RGAHX (9.02). LFGCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.11 vs. RGAHX (40.79).
| LFGCX | RGAHX | LFGCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.44 | 409% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 0.44 | 500% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.368 | 19.894 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 173M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.05 | 9.02 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 115.07 | 65.43 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.11 | 40.79 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers