Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGCX vs RGAHX
LFGCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts LFGCX vs RGAHX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth C
Price$39.31
Change-$0.69 (-1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.66M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$80.48
Change-$0.86 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
LFGCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGCX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. LFGCX (166M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than LFGCX: RGAHX (0.43) vs LFGCX (0.00). LFGCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: LFGCX (7 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). LFGCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). LFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LFGCX: RGAHX (250) vs LFGCX (1500). LFGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.21 vs. RGAHX (10.85). LFGCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.95 vs. RGAHX (21.41).
| LFGCX | RGAHX | LFGCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.44 | 409% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 0.44 | 500% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.549 | 2.650 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.21 | 10.85 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 119.42 | 59.22 | 202% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.95 | 21.41 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 123.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers