Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGCX vs RGACX
LFGCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LFGCX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth C
Price$39.54
Change+$0.08 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.03M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
LFGCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGCX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. LFGCX (154M). RGACX pays higher dividends than LFGCX: RGACX (0.07) vs LFGCX (0.00). LFGCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LFGCX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). LFGCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). LFGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LFGCX: RGACX (250) vs LFGCX (1500). LFGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.76 vs. RGACX (14.08). LFGCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.72 vs. RGACX (41.95).
| LFGCX | RGACX | LFGCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.94 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 0.94 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.344 | 14.044 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.76 | 14.08 | 289% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.27 | 41.19 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.72 | 41.95 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement