Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LFGAX vs RGACX
LFGAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LFGAX vs RGACX
Lord Abbett Focused Growth A
Price$41.69
Change+$0.08 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.03M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
LFGAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LFGAX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFGAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. LFGAX (154M). RGACX pays higher dividends than LFGAX: RGACX (0.07) vs LFGAX (0.00). LFGAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LFGAX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). LFGAX (1.45) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). LFGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LFGAX: RGACX (250) vs LFGAX (1500). LFGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.80 vs. RGACX (14.08). LFGAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.46 vs. RGACX (41.95).
| LFGAX | RGACX | LFGAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.94 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.94 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.880 | 14.044 | 106% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.80 | 14.08 | 297% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.29 | 41.19 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.46 | 41.95 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement