LFDJF
Price
$37.53
Change
+$1.47 (+4.08%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.3B
MCHVY
Price
$21.34
Change
+$0.34 (+1.62%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.04B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LFDJF vs MCHVY

Header iconLFDJF vs MCHVY Comparison
Open Charts LFDJF vs MCHVYBanner chart's image
LA FRANCAISE DES JEUX
Price$37.53
Change+$1.47 (+4.08%)
Volume$350
Capitalization7.3B
MGM China Holdings
Price$21.34
Change+$0.34 (+1.62%)
Volume$9.44K
Capitalization5.04B
LFDJF vs MCHVY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LFDJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LFDJF vs. MCHVY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFDJF is a Buy and MCHVY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (LFDJF: $37.53 vs. MCHVY: $21.34)
Brand notoriety: LFDJF and MCHVY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LFDJF: 29% vs. MCHVY: 1053%
Market capitalization -- LFDJF: $7.3B vs. MCHVY: $5.04B
LFDJF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $7.3B. MCHVY’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $5.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LFDJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHVY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LFDJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCHVY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LFDJF is a better buy in the long-term than MCHVY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LFDJF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHVY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LFDJF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCHVY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCHVY is a better buy in the short-term than LFDJF.

Price Growth

LFDJF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MCHVY (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +9.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +4.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.23%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+4.01% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFDJF($7.3B) has a higher market cap than MCHVY($5.04B). MCHVY YTD gains are higher at: 48.549 vs. LFDJF (-6.034). LFDJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 596M vs. MCHVY (-1.06B). MCHVY has more cash in the bank: 6.95B vs. LFDJF (786M). LFDJF has less debt than MCHVY: LFDJF (452M) vs MCHVY (30.6B). MCHVY has higher revenues than LFDJF: MCHVY (7.92B) vs LFDJF (2.54B).
LFDJFMCHVYLFDJF / MCHVY
Capitalization7.3B5.04B145%
EBITDA596M-1.06B-56%
Gain YTD-6.03448.549-12%
P/E Ratio21.88N/A-
Revenue2.54B7.92B32%
Total Cash786M6.95B11%
Total Debt452M30.6B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCHVY: Fundamental Ratings
MCHVY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
54
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LFDJFMCHVY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LFDJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GDXU75.900.90
+1.20%
MicroSectors™ Gold Miners 3X Lvrgd ETN
KAPR32.800.14
+0.43%
Innovator Russell 2000 Pwr Bffr ETF Apr
INDA55.790.19
+0.34%
iShares MSCI India ETF
ISVL42.310.13
+0.31%
iShares Intl Dev Sm Cp Val Fctr ETF
QBER24.66-0.04
-0.16%
TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF

LFDJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LFDJF and LTRY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LFDJF and LTRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFDJF
1D Price
Change %
LFDJF100%
N/A
LTRY - LFDJF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.27%
GXYYY - LFDJF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
GXYEF - LFDJF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVY - LFDJF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVF - LFDJF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCHVY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCHVY and AAPI have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCHVY and AAPI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHVY
1D Price
Change %
MCHVY100%
N/A
AAPI - MCHVY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WYNN - MCHVY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
GXYEF - MCHVY
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYYY - MCHVY
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
MCHVF - MCHVY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More