LFDJF
Price
$33.00
Change
+$1.16 (+3.64%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
6.01B
MCHVY
Price
$21.45
Change
+$0.11 (+0.52%)
Updated
Jul 8 closing price
Capitalization
7.73B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LFDJF vs MCHVY

Header iconLFDJF vs MCHVY Comparison
Open Charts LFDJF vs MCHVYBanner chart's image
LA FRANCAISE DES JEUX
Price$33.00
Change+$1.16 (+3.64%)
Volume$215
Capitalization6.01B
MGM China Holdings
Price$21.45
Change+$0.11 (+0.52%)
Volume$155
Capitalization7.73B
LFDJF vs MCHVY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LFDJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LFDJF vs. MCHVY commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFDJF is a Hold and MCHVY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (LFDJF: $33.00 vs. MCHVY: $20.49)
Brand notoriety: LFDJF and MCHVY are both not notable
LFDJF represents the Casinos/Gaming, while MCHVY is part of the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LFDJF: 99% vs. MCHVY: 20%
Market capitalization -- LFDJF: $6.01B vs. MCHVY: $7.73B
LFDJF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $6.01B. MCHVY’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $7.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $51.92B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $36.86B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.44B. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LFDJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHVY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LFDJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCHVY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCHVY is a better buy in the long-term than LFDJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LFDJF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHVY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LFDJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MCHVY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LFDJF is a better buy in the short-term than MCHVY.

Price Growth

LFDJF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MCHVY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.75%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.84%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+2.32% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-1.71% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHVY($7.73B) has a higher market cap than LFDJF($6.01B). LFDJF has higher P/E ratio than MCHVY: LFDJF (13.10) vs MCHVY (12.35). MCHVY YTD gains are higher at: 49.314 vs. LFDJF (-17.376).
LFDJFMCHVYLFDJF / MCHVY
Capitalization6.01B7.73B78%
EBITDA802MN/A-
Gain YTD-17.37649.314-35%
P/E Ratio13.1012.35106%
Revenue3.07BN/A-
Total Cash843MN/A-
Total Debt2.33BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCHVY: Fundamental Ratings
MCHVY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
20
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LFDJFMCHVY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LFDJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RJMG25.310.53
+2.16%
FT Raymond James Multcp Gr Eq ETF
EGGQ45.470.15
+0.33%
NestYield Visionary ETF
JLS18.87-0.02
-0.08%
Nuveen Mortgage and Income Fund
UTF26.14-0.04
-0.15%
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund
YMAG15.39-0.05
-0.32%
YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fd Of Opt IncETFs

LFDJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LFDJF and SEGG have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LFDJF and SEGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFDJF
1D Price
Change %
LFDJF100%
N/A
SEGG - LFDJF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
GXYYY - LFDJF
15%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
GXYEF - LFDJF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVY - LFDJF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVF - LFDJF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCHVY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MCHVY and AAPI have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MCHVY and AAPI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHVY
1D Price
Change %
MCHVY100%
N/A
AAPI - MCHVY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WYNN - MCHVY
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.62%
GXYEF - MCHVY
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYYY - MCHVY
15%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
MCHVF - MCHVY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More