LFDJF
Price
$32.87
Change
-$1.82 (-5.25%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
6.1B
MCHVF
Price
$1.90
Change
-$0.06 (-3.06%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
7.75B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LFDJF vs MCHVF

Header iconLFDJF vs MCHVF Comparison
Open Charts LFDJF vs MCHVFBanner chart's image
LA FRANCAISE DES JEUX
Price$32.87
Change-$1.82 (-5.25%)
Volume$150
Capitalization6.1B
MGM China Holdings
Price$1.90
Change-$0.06 (-3.06%)
Volume$300
Capitalization7.75B
LFDJF vs MCHVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LFDJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LFDJF vs. MCHVF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFDJF is a Hold and MCHVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (LFDJF: $32.87 vs. MCHVF: $1.90)
Brand notoriety: LFDJF and MCHVF are both not notable
LFDJF represents the Casinos/Gaming, while MCHVF is part of the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LFDJF: 68% vs. MCHVF: 80%
Market capitalization -- LFDJF: $6.1B vs. MCHVF: $7.75B
LFDJF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $6.1B. MCHVF’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $7.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $49.27B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $37.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.3B. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LFDJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHVF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LFDJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCHVF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCHVF is a better buy in the long-term than LFDJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LFDJF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHVF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LFDJF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MCHVF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LFDJF is a better buy in the short-term than MCHVF.

Price Growth

LFDJF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MCHVF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -8.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.07%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -1.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.13%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-0.51% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-1.94% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHVF($7.76B) has a higher market cap than LFDJF($6.1B). LFDJF has higher P/E ratio than MCHVF: LFDJF (16.09) vs MCHVF (13.09). MCHVF YTD gains are higher at: 80.952 vs. LFDJF (-17.702). MCHVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.78B vs. LFDJF (802M). MCHVF has more cash in the bank: 5.52B vs. LFDJF (843M). LFDJF has less debt than MCHVF: LFDJF (2.33B) vs MCHVF (21.8B). MCHVF has higher revenues than LFDJF: MCHVF (31.8B) vs LFDJF (3.07B).
LFDJFMCHVFLFDJF / MCHVF
Capitalization6.1B7.76B79%
EBITDA802M7.78B10%
Gain YTD-17.70280.952-22%
P/E Ratio16.0913.09123%
Revenue3.07B31.8B10%
Total Cash843M5.52B15%
Total Debt2.33B21.8B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCHVF: Fundamental Ratings
MCHVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73
SMR RATING
1..100
9
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LFDJFMCHVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LFDJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ADBG11.400.37
+3.35%
Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF
FFLG29.140.14
+0.48%
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Gr ETF
VEGN59.270.25
+0.42%
US Vegan Climate ETF
BSCQ19.55N/A
+0.03%
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corp Bd ETF
FMNY26.49N/A
N/A
First Trust New York High Inc Mncpl ETF

LFDJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LFDJF and SEGG have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LFDJF and SEGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFDJF
1D Price
Change %
LFDJF100%
N/A
SEGG - LFDJF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.80%
GXYYY - LFDJF
15%
Poorly correlated
+2.39%
GXYEF - LFDJF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
MCHVY - LFDJF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVF - LFDJF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCHVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHVF has been loosely correlated with SKYZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHVF jumps, then SKYZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHVF
1D Price
Change %
MCHVF100%
N/A
SKYZF - MCHVF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SCHYF - MCHVF
30%
Poorly correlated
-8.37%
GXYEF - MCHVF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
GXYYY - MCHVF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.39%
MCHVY - MCHVF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More