LFDJF
Price
$34.34
Change
+$0.53 (+1.57%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
7.3B
MCHVF
Price
$2.10
Change
+$0.33 (+18.64%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
5.04B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LFDJF vs MCHVF

Header iconLFDJF vs MCHVF Comparison
Open Charts LFDJF vs MCHVFBanner chart's image
LA FRANCAISE DES JEUX
Price$34.34
Change+$0.53 (+1.57%)
Volume$200
Capitalization7.3B
MGM China Holdings
Price$2.10
Change+$0.33 (+18.64%)
Volume$324
Capitalization5.04B
LFDJF vs MCHVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LFDJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LFDJF vs. MCHVF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LFDJF is a Hold and MCHVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (LFDJF: $34.34 vs. MCHVF: $2.10)
Brand notoriety: LFDJF and MCHVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LFDJF: 27% vs. MCHVF: 41%
Market capitalization -- LFDJF: $7.3B vs. MCHVF: $5.04B
LFDJF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $7.3B. MCHVF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $5.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LFDJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LFDJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCHVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LFDJF is a better buy in the long-term than MCHVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LFDJF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHVF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LFDJF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MCHVF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCHVF is a better buy in the short-term than LFDJF.

Price Growth

LFDJF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +1.57% price change this week, while MCHVF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +18.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+0.03% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFDJF($7.3B) has a higher market cap than MCHVF($5.04B). MCHVF YTD gains are higher at: 100.000 vs. LFDJF (-14.021). LFDJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 596M vs. MCHVF (-1.06B). MCHVF has more cash in the bank: 6.95B vs. LFDJF (786M). LFDJF has less debt than MCHVF: LFDJF (452M) vs MCHVF (30.6B). MCHVF has higher revenues than LFDJF: MCHVF (7.92B) vs LFDJF (2.54B).
LFDJFMCHVFLFDJF / MCHVF
Capitalization7.3B5.04B145%
EBITDA596M-1.06B-56%
Gain YTD-14.021100.000-14%
P/E Ratio21.88N/A-
Revenue2.54B7.92B32%
Total Cash786M6.95B11%
Total Debt452M30.6B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MCHVF: Fundamental Ratings
MCHVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
60
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LFDJFMCHVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LFDJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLX72.430.38
+0.53%
VanEck Steel ETF
IQSU50.710.25
+0.50%
NYLI Candriam U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
PFXF17.50-0.03
-0.17%
VanEck Pref Secs ex Fincls ETF
HELX28.31-0.09
-0.31%
Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF
ETHV53.35-1.50
-2.73%
VanEck Ethereum ETF

LFDJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LFDJF and SEGG have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LFDJF and SEGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFDJF
1D Price
Change %
LFDJF100%
N/A
SEGG - LFDJF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
GXYYY - LFDJF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
GXYEF - LFDJF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVY - LFDJF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVF - LFDJF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCHVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHVF has been loosely correlated with SKYZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHVF jumps, then SKYZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHVF
1D Price
Change %
MCHVF100%
N/A
SKYZF - MCHVF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SCHYF - MCHVF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYEF - MCHVF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYYY - MCHVF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
MCHVY - MCHVF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More