Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LEQCX vs NLSIX
LEQCX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts LEQCX vs NLSIX
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity C
Price$11.92
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.91M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.11
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
LEQCX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEQCX vs. NLSIX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEQCX is a StrongBuy and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.96B vs. LEQCX (30.9M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than LEQCX: NLSIX (0.02) vs LEQCX (0.00). LEQCX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: LEQCX (13 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). LEQCX (3.35) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). LEQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 755.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). LEQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: LEQCX (2500) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.24 vs. LEQCX (2.15). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 23.41 vs. LEQCX (9.68).
| LEQCX | NLSIX | LEQCX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.15 | 1.32 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.35 | 1.32 | 254% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.498 | 7.147 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.9M | 7.96B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.15 | 6.24 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.75 | 29.65 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.68 | 23.41 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.35 | 63.49 | 38% |