Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LEQCX vs NLSIX
LEQCX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts LEQCX vs NLSIX
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity C
Price$11.79
Change-$0.09 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.88M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.17
Change-$0.08 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.1B
LEQCX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEQCX vs. NLSIX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEQCX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 8.1B vs. LEQCX (33.9M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than LEQCX: NLSIX (0.02) vs LEQCX (0.00). LEQCX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: LEQCX (13 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). LEQCX (3.35) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). LEQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 755.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). LEQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: LEQCX (2500) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.77 vs. LEQCX (2.25). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 23.23 vs. LEQCX (16.04).
| LEQCX | NLSIX | LEQCX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.15 | 1.32 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.35 | 1.32 | 254% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.550 | 7.573 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.9M | 8.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.25 | 7.77 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.13 | 23.38 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.04 | 23.23 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.10 | 64.41 | 41% |