Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LEQCX vs NLSIX
LEQCX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts LEQCX vs NLSIX
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity C
Price$11.81
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.11M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.00
Change+$0.03 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.82B
LEQCX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEQCX vs. NLSIX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEQCX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.82B vs. LEQCX (34.1M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than LEQCX: NLSIX (0.02) vs LEQCX (0.00). LEQCX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: LEQCX (12 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). LEQCX (3.35) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). LEQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 755.00 vs. NLSIX (48.00). LEQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: LEQCX (2500) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.02 vs. LEQCX (5.16). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 23.45 vs. LEQCX (21.25).
| LEQCX | NLSIX | LEQCX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.15 | 1.32 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.35 | 1.32 | 254% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.723 | 6.667 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.1M | 7.82B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.16 | 8.02 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.44 | 24.74 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.25 | 23.45 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.24 | 59.69 | 42% |