Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LEQCX vs NLSCX
LEQCX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts LEQCX vs NLSCX
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity C
Price$11.81
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.11M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.70
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.82B
LEQCX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEQCX vs. NLSCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEQCX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.82B vs. LEQCX (34.1M). LEQCX (0.00) and NLSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . LEQCX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: LEQCX (12 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). LEQCX (3.35) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). LEQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 755.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEQCX: NLSCX (1000) vs LEQCX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.80 vs. LEQCX (5.16). LEQCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.25 vs. NLSCX (16.30).
| LEQCX | NLSCX | LEQCX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.15 | 2.43 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.35 | 2.43 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.723 | 5.709 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.1M | 7.82B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.16 | 6.80 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.44 | 20.33 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.25 | 16.30 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.24 | 42.34 | 60% |