Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LEQAX vs NLSCX
LEQAX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts LEQAX vs NLSCX
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity A
Price$13.03
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.91M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.76
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
LEQAX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEQAX vs. NLSCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEQAX is a StrongBuy and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.96B vs. LEQAX (30.9M). LEQAX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: LEQAX (0.49) vs NLSCX (0.00). LEQAX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: LEQAX (13 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). LEQAX (2.60) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). LEQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 755.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEQAX: NLSCX (1000) vs LEQAX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.16 vs. LEQAX (2.96). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 16.45 vs. LEQAX (14.54).
| LEQAX | NLSCX | LEQAX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 2.43 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.60 | 2.43 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.249 | 6.049 | 54% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.9M | 7.96B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.96 | 5.16 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.60 | 25.44 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.54 | 16.45 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.43 | 45.89 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement