Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LEQAX vs NLSCX
LEQAX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts LEQAX vs NLSCX
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity A
Price$10.93
Change-$0.06 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets30.17M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.72
Change-$0.09 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
LEQAX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEQAX vs. NLSCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEQAX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.99B vs. LEQAX (30.2M). LEQAX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: LEQAX (1.46) vs NLSCX (0.00). LEQAX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: LEQAX (13 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). LEQAX (2.60) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). LEQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 755.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEQAX: NLSCX (1000) vs LEQAX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.64 vs. LEQAX (-11.50). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 17.08 vs. LEQAX (-5.32).
| LEQAX | NLSCX | LEQAX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 2.43 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.60 | 2.43 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.674 | -0.160 | -1,046% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 30.2M | 7.99B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.50 | 5.64 | -204% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.72 | 23.52 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.32 | 17.08 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.81 | 52.97 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers