Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LEQAX vs NLSCX
LEQAX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts LEQAX vs NLSCX
LoCorr Dynamic Opportunity A
Price$13.11
Change-$0.02 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.75M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.81
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.53B
LEQAX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEQAX vs. NLSCX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEQAX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.53B vs. LEQAX (39.7M). LEQAX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: LEQAX (0.49) vs NLSCX (0.00). LEQAX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: LEQAX (12 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). LEQAX (2.60) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). LEQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 755.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEQAX: NLSCX (1000) vs LEQAX (2500). LEQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.60 vs. NLSCX (9.70). LEQAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.13 vs. NLSCX (18.72).
| LEQAX | NLSCX | LEQAX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 2.43 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.60 | 2.43 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.041 | 6.105 | 66% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.7M | 7.53B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.60 | 9.70 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.53 | 15.09 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.13 | 18.72 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.32 | 44.29 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement