Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LEGCX vs RGACX
LEGCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LEGCX vs RGACX
Columbia Large Cap Growth C
Price$54.44
Change-$0.09 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.34B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
LEGCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEGCX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEGCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. LEGCX (6.34B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LEGCX: RGACX (0.07) vs LEGCX (0.00). LEGCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LEGCX (23 years) vs RGACX (23 years). LEGCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). LEGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LEGCX: RGACX (250) vs LEGCX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. LEGCX (9.82). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. LEGCX (31.59).
| LEGCX | RGACX | LEGCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.94 | 184% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.73 | 0.94 | 184% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.230 | 14.044 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.34B | 329B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.82 | 14.08 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.77 | 41.19 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.59 | 41.95 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.79 | 83.68 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers