Advertisement
LEG vs RWX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEG is a Hold and RWX is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LEG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- LEG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LEG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- LEG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LEG (@Home Furnishings) experienced а +2.07% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was -2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.44%.
Reported Earning Dates
LEG is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Home Furnishings (-2.22% weekly)The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.
LEG | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LEG | RWX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 73% | 25 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ASGI | 19.94 | -0.09 | -0.45% |
| abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund | |||
| MFM | 5.16 | -0.03 | -0.48% |
| MFS Municipal Income Trust | |||
| CPAI | 35.08 | -0.29 | -0.83% |
| Counterpoint Quantitative Equity ETF | |||
| MSLC | 49.21 | -0.59 | -1.18% |
| Morgan Stanley Pathway Large Cap Eq ETF | |||
| GSUS | 82.49 | -0.99 | -1.19% |
| Goldman Sachs MarketBeta US Equity ETF | |||
LEG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEG has been loosely correlated with MHK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LEG jumps, then MHK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEG | 100% | -3.45% | ||
| MHK - LEG | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.19% | ||
| ETD - LEG | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| MLKN - LEG | 49% Loosely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| AMWD - LEG | 48% Loosely correlated | -4.22% | ||
| PATK - LEG | 48% Loosely correlated | -3.34% | ||
More | ||||
RWX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RWX has been loosely correlated with LAND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RWX jumps, then LAND could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RWX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RWX | 100% | -0.84% | ||
| LAND - RWX | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| SAFE - RWX | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.74% | ||
| LEG - RWX | 29% Poorly correlated | -3.45% | ||
| LI - RWX | 29% Poorly correlated | -3.84% | ||
| HMN - RWX | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.79% | ||
More | ||||