LEAT
Price
$9.90
Change
-$0.10 (-1.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
68.97M
NINOF
Price
$9.60
Change
-$0.40 (-4.00%)
Updated
May 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.61B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LEAT vs NINOF

Header iconLEAT vs NINOF Comparison
Open Charts LEAT vs NINOFBanner chart's image
Leatt
Price$9.90
Change-$0.10 (-1.00%)
Volume$1.26K
Capitalization68.97M
Nikon
Price$9.60
Change-$0.40 (-4.00%)
Volume$418
Capitalization4.61B
LEAT vs NINOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LEAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NINOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LEAT vs. NINOF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEAT is a Hold and NINOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (LEAT: $9.90 vs. NINOF: $9.60)
Brand notoriety: LEAT and NINOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LEAT: 34% vs. NINOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- LEAT: $68.97M vs. NINOF: $4.61B
LEAT [@Recreational Products] is valued at $68.97M. NINOF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $4.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LEAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNINOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LEAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NINOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LEAT and NINOF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LEAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NINOF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LEAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NINOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NINOF is a better buy in the short-term than LEAT.

Price Growth

LEAT (@Recreational Products) experienced а +6.72% price change this week, while NINOF (@Recreational Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+1.26% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NINOF($4.61B) has a higher market cap than LEAT($69M). NINOF has higher P/E ratio than LEAT: NINOF (14.93) vs LEAT (10.45). LEAT YTD gains are higher at: 41.429 vs. NINOF (2.128). NINOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 90.3B vs. LEAT (10.4M). NINOF has more cash in the bank: 315B vs. LEAT (11.4M). LEAT has less debt than NINOF: LEAT (1.89M) vs NINOF (133B). NINOF has higher revenues than LEAT: NINOF (589B) vs LEAT (65.2M).
LEATNINOFLEAT / NINOF
Capitalization69M4.61B1%
EBITDA10.4M90.3B0%
Gain YTD41.4292.1281,947%
P/E Ratio10.4514.9370%
Revenue65.2M589B0%
Total Cash11.4M315B0%
Total Debt1.89M133B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LEAT vs NINOF: Fundamental Ratings
LEAT
NINOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7782
SMR RATING
1..100
90100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3975
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
35n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NINOF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LEAT (76). This means that NINOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LEAT’s over the last 12 months.

LEAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as NINOF (82). This means that LEAT’s stock grew similarly to NINOF’s over the last 12 months.

LEAT's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as NINOF (100). This means that LEAT’s stock grew similarly to NINOF’s over the last 12 months.

LEAT's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NINOF (75). This means that LEAT’s stock grew somewhat faster than NINOF’s over the last 12 months.

LEAT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as NINOF (2). This means that LEAT’s stock grew similarly to NINOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LEATNINOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
75%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LEAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NINOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAML37.460.16
+0.43%
Congress Large Cap Growth ETF
ICLN13.970.05
+0.36%
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
BERZ5.320.01
+0.19%
MicroSectors™ St FANG&Inn 3X Inv Ld ETNs
CPSJ26.280.05
+0.17%
Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-Jul
QAT19.630.02
+0.10%
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF

LEAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LEAT and GYYMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LEAT and GYYMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEAT
1D Price
Change %
LEAT100%
-1.00%
GYYMF - LEAT
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NINOF - LEAT
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NINOY - LEAT
12%
Poorly correlated
-3.29%
NCBDF - LEAT
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNNGF - LEAT
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NINOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NINOF and LEAT have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NINOF and LEAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NINOF
1D Price
Change %
NINOF100%
N/A
LEAT - NINOF
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
NINOY - NINOF
15%
Poorly correlated
-3.29%
LNNGY - NINOF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.73%
NCBDF - NINOF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OLCLF - NINOF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More