LEAT
Price
$11.97
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
74.42M
LNNGF
Price
$2.10
Change
-$0.28 (-11.76%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
5.61B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LEAT vs LNNGF

Header iconLEAT vs LNNGF Comparison
Open Charts LEAT vs LNNGFBanner chart's image
Leatt
Price$11.97
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.29K
Capitalization74.42M
Li Ning
Price$2.10
Change-$0.28 (-11.76%)
Volume$6.48K
Capitalization5.61B
LEAT vs LNNGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LEAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LEAT vs. LNNGF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEAT is a Hold and LNNGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (LEAT: $11.97 vs. LNNGF: $2.10)
Brand notoriety: LEAT and LNNGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LEAT: 48% vs. LNNGF: 387%
Market capitalization -- LEAT: $74.42M vs. LNNGF: $5.61B
LEAT [@Recreational Products] is valued at $74.42M. LNNGF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $5.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $38.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $4.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LEAT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLNNGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LEAT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LNNGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LNNGF is a better buy in the long-term than LEAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LEAT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNNGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LEAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LNNGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LEAT is a better buy in the short-term than LNNGF.

Price Growth

LEAT (@Recreational Products) experienced а -5.52% price change this week, while LNNGF (@Recreational Products) price change was -11.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-0.99% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNNGF($5.61B) has a higher market cap than LEAT($74.4M). LEAT has higher P/E ratio than LNNGF: LEAT (39.90) vs LNNGF (13.84). LEAT YTD gains are higher at: 71.000 vs. LNNGF (-12.500).
LEATLNNGFLEAT / LNNGF
Capitalization74.4M5.61B1%
EBITDA2.89MN/A-
Gain YTD71.000-12.500-568%
P/E Ratio39.9013.84288%
Revenue54.9MN/A-
Total Cash15.7MN/A-
Total Debt652KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LEAT vs LNNGF: Fundamental Ratings
LEAT
LNNGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
79100
SMR RATING
1..100
8637
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4159
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3729
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LNNGF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LEAT (73). This means that LNNGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LEAT’s over the last 12 months.

LEAT's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as LNNGF (100). This means that LEAT’s stock grew similarly to LNNGF’s over the last 12 months.

LNNGF's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LEAT (86). This means that LNNGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LEAT’s over the last 12 months.

LEAT's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as LNNGF (59). This means that LEAT’s stock grew similarly to LNNGF’s over the last 12 months.

LNNGF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as LEAT (37). This means that LNNGF’s stock grew similarly to LEAT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LEATLNNGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LEAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LNNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMCG82.100.79
+0.97%
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
TPZ21.080.16
+0.74%
Tortoise Essential Energy Fund
LRGE82.580.32
+0.39%
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth Select ETF
WABF25.47N/A
N/A
Western Asset Bond ETF
EMEQ35.06-0.38
-1.06%
Macquarie Focused Emerging Mrkts Eq ETF

LEAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LEAT and GYYMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LEAT and GYYMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEAT
1D Price
Change %
LEAT100%
N/A
GYYMF - LEAT
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NINOF - LEAT
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NINOY - LEAT
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
NCBDF - LEAT
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNNGF - LEAT
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LNNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LNNGF and GDHG have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LNNGF and GDHG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNNGF
1D Price
Change %
LNNGF100%
N/A
GDHG - LNNGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
SNMSF - LNNGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNNGY - LNNGF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
OLCLY - LNNGF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.71%
LEAT - LNNGF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More