Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LEAD vs RECS
LEAD vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts LEAD vs RECS
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF
Price$71.37
Change+$0.45 (+0.63%)
Volume$1.58K
Net Assets60.73M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$36.66
Change+$0.21 (+0.58%)
Volume$376.74K
Net Assets3.02B
LEAD vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEAD vs. RECS commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEAD is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.02B vs. LEAD (60.7M). LEAD has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: LEAD (7.803) vs RECS (5.893). LEAD was incepted earlier than RECS: LEAD (9 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than LEAD (0.43). LEAD has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| LEAD | RECS | LEAD / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 7.803 | 5.893 | 132% |
| Net Assets | 60.7M | 3.02B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.15 | 287% |
| Turnover | 65.19 | 49.00 | 133% |
| Yield | 0.86 | 0.69 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LEAD | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LEAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEAD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEAD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEAD | 100% | +0.64% | ||
| LRCX - LEAD | 73% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| J - LEAD | 71% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| HUBB - LEAD | 71% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| PNR - LEAD | 71% Closely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| CTSH - LEAD | 70% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| CR - RECS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.85% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| EXP - RECS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| INTU - RECS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
More | ||||