Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LEAD vs RECS
LEAD vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts LEAD vs RECS
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF
Price$78.72
Change-$0.93 (-1.17%)
Volume$177
Net Assets73.1M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$41.17
Change-$0.24 (-0.58%)
Volume$2.42K
Net Assets4.95B
LEAD vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEAD vs. RECS commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEAD is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 4.95B vs. LEAD (73.1M). LEAD has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: LEAD (4.486) vs RECS (1.396). LEAD was incepted earlier than RECS: LEAD (10 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than LEAD (0.43). RECS has a higher turnover LEAD (26.00) vs LEAD (26.00).
| LEAD | RECS | LEAD / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 4.486 | 1.396 | 321% |
| Net Assets | 73.1M | 4.95B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.15 | 287% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 49.00 | 53% |
| Yield | 0.69 | 0.79 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LEAD | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 70% | 15 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LEAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEAD has been closely correlated with HUBB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEAD jumps, then HUBB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEAD | 100% | -0.24% | ||
| HUBB - LEAD | 71% Closely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| J - LEAD | 66% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| LIN - LEAD | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| GL - LEAD | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| SPGI - LEAD | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
More | ||||