Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LEAD vs RECS
LEAD vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts LEAD vs RECS
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF
Price$75.28
Change+$0.43 (+0.57%)
Volume$7.4K
Net Assets61.82M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$40.06
Change+$0.24 (+0.60%)
Volume$619.39K
Net Assets3.82B
LEAD vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEAD vs. RECS commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEAD is a Hold and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.82B vs. LEAD (61.8M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than LEAD: RECS (15.713) vs LEAD (13.812). LEAD was incepted earlier than RECS: LEAD (10 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than LEAD (0.43). RECS has a higher turnover LEAD (26.00) vs LEAD (26.00).
| LEAD | RECS | LEAD / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 13.812 | 15.713 | 88% |
| Net Assets | 61.8M | 3.82B | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.15 | 287% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 49.00 | 53% |
| Yield | 0.82 | 0.62 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LEAD | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LEAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LEAD and MCHP have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LEAD and MCHP's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEAD | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| MCHP - LEAD | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.65% | ||
| ALB - LEAD | 13% Poorly correlated | +3.85% | ||
| J - LEAD | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
| MPC - LEAD | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
| ACN - LEAD | 11% Poorly correlated | +2.76% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| CR - RECS | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| EXP - RECS | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| INTU - RECS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
More | ||||