Intraday BUY SELL Signals
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LEAD vs LW
LEAD vs LW Comparison
Open Charts LEAD vs LW
Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF
Price$74.62
Change-$2.20 (-2.86%)
Volume$6.04K
Net Assets67.32M
Lamb Weston Holdings
Price$57.83
Change-$0.63 (-1.08%)
Volume$1.65M
Capitalization8.06B
LEAD vs LW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LEAD vs. LW commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEAD is a Buy and LW is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LW: Fundamental Ratings
LW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LEAD | LW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 18 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LEAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEAD has been closely correlated with J. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEAD jumps, then J could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEAD | 100% | +0.29% | ||
| J - LEAD | 69% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
| HUBB - LEAD | 67% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| LIN - LEAD | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| GL - LEAD | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| LW - LEAD | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.73% | ||
More | ||||
LW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LW has been loosely correlated with CAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LW jumps, then CAG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y