LW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LEAD | LW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 6 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 80% | 8 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 69% | 14 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 62% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEAD has been closely correlated with HUBB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEAD jumps, then HUBB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LEAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEAD | 100% | N/A | ||
| HUBB - LEAD | 70% Closely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| J - LEAD | 67% Closely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| LIN - LEAD | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| GL - LEAD | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| LW - LEAD | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.71% | ||
More | ||||