LEA
Price
$132.51
Change
+$12.91 (+10.79%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.2B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MPAA
Price
$13.13
Change
-$0.18 (-1.35%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
260.32M
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LEA vs MPAA

Header iconLEA vs MPAA Comparison
Open Charts LEA vs MPAABanner chart's image
Lear
Price$132.51
Change+$12.91 (+10.79%)
Volume$5.92K
Capitalization6.2B
Motorcar Parts of America
Price$13.13
Change-$0.18 (-1.35%)
Volume$2.83K
Capitalization260.32M
LEA vs MPAA Comparison Chart in %
LEA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MPAA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LEA vs. MPAA commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LEA is a Hold and MPAA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (LEA: $119.60 vs. MPAA: $13.32)
Brand notoriety: LEA and MPAA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LEA: 138% vs. MPAA: 77%
Market capitalization -- LEA: $6.2B vs. MPAA: $260.32M
LEA [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $6.2B. MPAA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $260.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $81.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LEA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMPAA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LEA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MPAA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LEA is a better buy in the long-term than MPAA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LEA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MPAA’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LEA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MPAA’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MPAA is a better buy in the short-term than LEA.

Price Growth

LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -0.78% price change this week, while MPAA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +3.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

LEA is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

MPAA is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.39% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LEA($6.2B) has a higher market cap than MPAA($260M). MPAA has higher P/E ratio than LEA: MPAA (110.92) vs LEA (14.59). MPAA YTD gains are higher at: 7.942 vs. LEA (4.363). LEA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.38B vs. MPAA (73.9M). MPAA has less debt than LEA: MPAA (187M) vs LEA (2.79B). LEA has higher revenues than MPAA: LEA (23B) vs MPAA (789M).
LEAMPAALEA / MPAA
Capitalization6.2B260M2,386%
EBITDA1.38B73.9M1,869%
Gain YTD4.3637.94255%
P/E Ratio14.59110.9213%
Revenue23B789M2,915%
Total CashN/A17.7M-
Total Debt2.79B187M1,493%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LEA vs MPAA: Fundamental Ratings
LEA
MPAA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7368
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
7489
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4847
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1689
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LEA's Valuation (22) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is significantly better than the same rating for MPAA (89) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew significantly faster than MPAA’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MPAA (100) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to MPAA’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's SMR Rating (74) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MPAA (89) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to MPAA’s over the last 12 months.

MPAA's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry is in the same range as LEA (48) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that MPAA’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is significantly better than the same rating for MPAA (89) in the Automotive Aftermarket industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew significantly faster than MPAA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LEAMPAA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LEA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MPAA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDXAY10.430.04
+0.38%
Sodexo
PRSEF4.95N/A
N/A
Prosafe SE (Cyprus)
SCCFF0.22N/A
N/A
Strategic Resources Inc.
GTBIF6.70-0.02
-0.30%
Green Thumb Industries Inc.
LDNXF99.30-11.54
-10.41%
London Stock Exchange Group plc

LEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEA has been closely correlated with ADNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEA jumps, then ADNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEA
1D Price
Change %
LEA100%
+1.36%
ADNT - LEA
78%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
VC - LEA
77%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
MGA - LEA
76%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
BWA - LEA
76%
Closely correlated
+0.87%
THRM - LEA
70%
Closely correlated
-1.79%
More

MPAA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPAA has been loosely correlated with AXL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MPAA jumps, then AXL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPAA
1D Price
Change %
MPAA100%
+1.76%
AXL - MPAA
37%
Loosely correlated
+3.01%
STRT - MPAA
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
DAN - MPAA
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.27%
ALV - MPAA
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
LEA - MPAA
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
More