LDSVF
Price
$15947.54
Change
-$664.28 (-4.00%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
28.65B
NCHEY
Price
$12.10
Change
+$1.10 (+10.00%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
3.43B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LDSVF vs NCHEY

Header iconLDSVF vs NCHEY Comparison
Open Charts LDSVF vs NCHEYBanner chart's image
Lindt & Sprungli AG
Price$15947.54
Change-$664.28 (-4.00%)
Volume$1
Capitalization28.65B
Nichirei
Price$12.10
Change+$1.10 (+10.00%)
Volume$319
Capitalization3.43B
LDSVF vs NCHEY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LDSVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LDSVF vs. NCHEY commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDSVF is a Hold and NCHEY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (LDSVF: $15947.54 vs. NCHEY: $12.10)
Brand notoriety: LDSVF and NCHEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LDSVF: 17% vs. NCHEY: 100%
Market capitalization -- LDSVF: $28.65B vs. NCHEY: $3.43B
LDSVF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $28.65B. NCHEY’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $3.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LDSVF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNCHEY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LDSVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NCHEY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LDSVF is a better buy in the long-term than NCHEY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LDSVF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LDSVF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

LDSVF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -4.00% price change this week, while NCHEY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LDSVF($28.6B) has a higher market cap than NCHEY($3.44B). LDSVF has higher P/E ratio than NCHEY: LDSVF (43.48) vs NCHEY (19.39). LDSVF YTD gains are higher at: 44.037 vs. NCHEY (0.000). NCHEY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 38.6B vs. LDSVF (1.02B). NCHEY has more cash in the bank: 44.4B vs. LDSVF (865M). LDSVF has less debt than NCHEY: LDSVF (1.44B) vs NCHEY (128B). NCHEY has higher revenues than LDSVF: NCHEY (676B) vs LDSVF (4.97B).
LDSVFNCHEYLDSVF / NCHEY
Capitalization28.6B3.44B833%
EBITDA1.02B38.6B3%
Gain YTD44.0370.000-
P/E Ratio43.4819.39224%
Revenue4.97B676B1%
Total Cash865M44.4B2%
Total Debt1.44B128B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LDSVF vs NCHEY: Fundamental Ratings
LDSVF
NCHEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2565
SMR RATING
1..100
7698
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4172
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2958
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LDSVF's Valuation (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCHEY (97). This means that LDSVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCHEY’s over the last 12 months.

LDSVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCHEY (65). This means that LDSVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCHEY’s over the last 12 months.

LDSVF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as NCHEY (98). This means that LDSVF’s stock grew similarly to NCHEY’s over the last 12 months.

LDSVF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as NCHEY (72). This means that LDSVF’s stock grew similarly to NCHEY’s over the last 12 months.

LDSVF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as NCHEY (58). This means that LDSVF’s stock grew similarly to NCHEY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LDSVFNCHEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LDSVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AOD8.780.10
+1.15%
abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund
LQDW25.460.01
+0.04%
iShares Invm Grd Crp Bd Buywrt Stgy ETF
PAWZ57.53-0.13
-0.23%
ProShares Pet Care ETF
CETH12.07-0.11
-0.90%
21shares Core Ethereum ETF
EWV31.76-1.28
-3.87%
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan

LDSVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LDSVF and MDLZ have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LDSVF and MDLZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LDSVF
1D Price
Change %
LDSVF100%
N/A
MDLZ - LDSVF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
K - LDSVF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
KRYAY - LDSVF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
NCHEY - LDSVF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAMA - LDSVF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
More

NCHEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCHEY and LYSFF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCHEY and LYSFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCHEY
1D Price
Change %
NCHEY100%
N/A
LYSFF - NCHEY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAMA - NCHEY
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
LDSVF - NCHEY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLFNF - NCHEY
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
NFPDF - NCHEY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More