LDSVF
Price
$11450.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
MDLZ
Price
$64.40
Change
-$1.16 (-1.77%)
Updated
Nov 15, 03:30 PM (EDT)
75 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LDSVF vs MDLZ

Header iconLDSVF vs MDLZ Comparison
Open Charts LDSVF vs MDLZBanner chart's image
Lindt & Sprungli AG
Price$11450.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1
CapitalizationN/A
Mondelez International
Price$64.40
Change-$1.16 (-1.77%)
Volume$1.06K
CapitalizationN/A
LDSVF vs MDLZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
MDLZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LDSVF vs. MDLZ commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDSVF is a Hold and MDLZ is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (LDSVF: $11450.00 vs. MDLZ: $65.56)
Brand notoriety: LDSVF: Not notable vs. MDLZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LDSVF: 15% vs. MDLZ: 119%
Market capitalization -- LDSVF: $28.65B vs. MDLZ: $94.25B
LDSVF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $28.65B. MDLZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $94.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LDSVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LDSVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MDLZ is a better buy in the long-term than LDSVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MDLZ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

LDSVF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -4.46% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.21% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDLZ($94.3B) has a higher market cap than LDSVF($28.6B). LDSVF has higher P/E ratio than MDLZ: LDSVF (43.48) vs MDLZ (19.27). LDSVF YTD gains are higher at: -4.384 vs. MDLZ (-7.763). MDLZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.65B vs. LDSVF (1.02B). MDLZ has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. LDSVF (865M). LDSVF has less debt than MDLZ: LDSVF (1.44B) vs MDLZ (19.9B). MDLZ has higher revenues than LDSVF: MDLZ (36B) vs LDSVF (4.97B).
LDSVFMDLZLDSVF / MDLZ
Capitalization28.6B94.3B30%
EBITDA1.02B7.65B13%
Gain YTD-4.384-7.76356%
P/E Ratio43.4819.27226%
Revenue4.97B36B14%
Total Cash865M1.81B48%
Total Debt1.44B19.9B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LDSVF vs MDLZ: Fundamental Ratings
LDSVF
MDLZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6857
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3928
SMR RATING
1..100
8061
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7460
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7253
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MDLZ's Valuation (41) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LDSVF (57) in the null industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to LDSVF’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LDSVF (39) in the null industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to LDSVF’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's SMR Rating (61) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LDSVF (80) in the null industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to LDSVF’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LDSVF (74) in the null industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to LDSVF’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as LDSVF (72) in the null industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to LDSVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MDLZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MDLZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

LDSVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LDSVF and MDLZ have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LDSVF and MDLZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LDSVF
1D Price
Change %
LDSVF100%
-0.43%
MDLZ - LDSVF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
K - LDSVF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
KRYAY - LDSVF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
NCHEY - LDSVF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAMA - LDSVF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.78%
More

MDLZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDLZ
1D Price
Change %
MDLZ100%
-0.67%
GIS - MDLZ
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
HSY - MDLZ
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.99%
CAG - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
KHC - MDLZ
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
FLO - MDLZ
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
More