LDSVF
Price
$14632.28
Change
+$17.29 (+0.12%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
33.34B
MAMA
Price
$7.95
Change
-$0.07 (-0.87%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:53 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
301.64M
36 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LDSVF vs MAMA

Header iconLDSVF vs MAMA Comparison
Open Charts LDSVF vs MAMABanner chart's image
Lindt & Sprungli AG
Price$14632.28
Change+$17.29 (+0.12%)
Volume$3
Capitalization33.34B
Mama's Creations
Price$7.95
Change-$0.07 (-0.87%)
Volume$300
Capitalization301.64M
LDSVF vs MAMA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LDSVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LDSVF vs. MAMA commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDSVF is a Hold and MAMA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (LDSVF: $14632.28 vs. MAMA: $8.02)
Brand notoriety: LDSVF and MAMA are both not notable
LDSVF represents the Food: Specialty/Candy, while MAMA is part of the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LDSVF: 93% vs. MAMA: 63%
Market capitalization -- LDSVF: $33.34B vs. MAMA: $301.64M
LDSVF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $33.34B. MAMA’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $301.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $80B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $230.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $14.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LDSVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAMA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LDSVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MAMA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAMA is a better buy in the long-term than LDSVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LDSVF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAMA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LDSVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MAMA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LDSVF is a better buy in the short-term than MAMA.

Price Growth

LDSVF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -1.86% price change this week, while MAMA (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -0.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.61%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +834.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

MAMA is expected to report earnings on Sep 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.95% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.63% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LDSVF($33.3B) has a higher market cap than MAMA($302M). MAMA has higher P/E ratio than LDSVF: MAMA (72.91) vs LDSVF (42.62). LDSVF YTD gains are higher at: 32.158 vs. MAMA (0.754). LDSVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.18B vs. MAMA (7.9M). LDSVF has more cash in the bank: 273M vs. MAMA (12M). MAMA has less debt than LDSVF: MAMA (12.8M) vs LDSVF (1.69B). LDSVF has higher revenues than MAMA: LDSVF (5.66B) vs MAMA (129M).
LDSVFMAMALDSVF / MAMA
Capitalization33.3B302M11,026%
EBITDA1.18B7.9M14,906%
Gain YTD32.1580.7544,266%
P/E Ratio42.6272.9158%
Revenue5.66B129M4,390%
Total Cash273M12M2,275%
Total Debt1.69B12.8M13,234%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LDSVF vs MAMA: Fundamental Ratings
LDSVF
MAMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3429
SMR RATING
1..100
7347
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5351
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3522
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LDSVF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAMA (90). This means that LDSVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAMA’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as LDSVF (34). This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to LDSVF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as LDSVF (73). This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to LDSVF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as LDSVF (53). This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to LDSVF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMA's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is in the same range as LDSVF (35). This means that MAMA’s stock grew similarly to LDSVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LDSVFMAMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LDSVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTON7.840.73
+10.27%
Peloton Interactive
SYF69.430.98
+1.43%
Synchrony Financial
CCBG39.110.42
+1.09%
Capital City Bank Group
BHAT1.78N/A
N/A
Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology
CTOR1.81-0.04
-2.16%
Citius Oncology Inc

LDSVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LDSVF and MDLZ have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LDSVF and MDLZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LDSVF
1D Price
Change %
LDSVF100%
N/A
MDLZ - LDSVF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
K - LDSVF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
KRYAY - LDSVF
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
NCHEY - LDSVF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAMA - LDSVF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
More

MAMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAMA and JBSS have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAMA and JBSS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAMA
1D Price
Change %
MAMA100%
-1.47%
JBSS - MAMA
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
BYND - MAMA
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.00%
DAR - MAMA
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
SMPL - MAMA
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
LWAY - MAMA
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More