Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFVX vs RMFEX
LDFVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LDFVX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity A
Price$16.10
Change-$1.29 (-7.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.12B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.60
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.34B
LDFVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFVX is a Buy and RMFEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. LDFVX (2.12B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LDFVX: RMFEX (1.43) vs LDFVX (0.00). LDFVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LDFVX (29 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LDFVX (0.95) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LDFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LDFVX: RMFEX (250) vs LDFVX (1500). LDFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.99 vs. RMFEX (5.83). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.19 vs. LDFVX (50.49).
| LDFVX | RMFEX | LDFVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.62 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.62 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.395 | 15.285 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.12B | 113B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.99 | 5.83 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.36 | 28.26 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.49 | 55.19 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.59 | 97.17 | 56% |