Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFVX vs RMFCX
LDFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LDFVX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity A
Price$16.89
Change+$0.08 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.08B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.51
Change+$0.17 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LDFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LDFVX (2.08B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LDFVX: RMFCX (1.20) vs LDFVX (0.74). LDFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LDFVX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LDFVX (0.95) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . LDFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LDFVX: RMFCX (250) vs LDFVX (1500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. LDFVX (4.57). RMFCX (57.10) and LDFVX (55.33) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LDFVX | RMFCX | LDFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.91 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.077 | 13.689 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.08B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 1.20 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.57 | 4.96 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.54 | 38.79 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.33 | 57.10 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.55 | 91.18 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement