Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFVX vs RMEBX
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LDFVX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity A
Price$16.89
Change+$0.08 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LDFVX (2.07B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LDFVX: RMEBX (1.05) vs LDFVX (0.74). LDFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LDFVX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LDFVX (0.95). LDFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LDFVX: RMEBX (250) vs LDFVX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.81 vs. LDFVX (4.57). RMEBX (55.95) and LDFVX (55.33) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LDFVX | RMEBX | LDFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.077 | 13.527 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.07B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 1.05 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.57 | 4.81 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.54 | 38.19 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.33 | 55.95 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.55 | 89.36 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement