Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFVX vs RMEBX
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LDFVX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity A
Price$16.75
Change+$0.07 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.18B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.63
Change+$0.22 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LDFVX (2.18B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LDFVX: RMEBX (1.10) vs LDFVX (0.50). LDFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LDFVX (30 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LDFVX (0.95). LDFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LDFVX: RMEBX (250) vs LDFVX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.40 vs. LDFVX (8.06). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.71 vs. LDFVX (37.97).
| LDFVX | RMEBX | LDFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.509 | 2.467 | 102% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 1.10 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.06 | 10.40 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.35 | 27.99 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.97 | 43.71 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.58 | 108.89 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement