Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFVX vs RMEBX
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LDFVX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity A
Price$16.55
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.17B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.72
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LDFVX (2.17B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LDFVX: RMEBX (1.03) vs LDFVX (0.00). LDFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LDFVX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LDFVX (0.95). LDFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LDFVX: RMEBX (250) vs LDFVX (1500). LDFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. RMEBX (7.97). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.21 vs. LDFVX (42.35).
| LDFVX | RMEBX | LDFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.887 | 9.599 | 103% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.17B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.03 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.52 | 7.97 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.61 | 28.41 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.35 | 45.21 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.70 | 90.05 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement