Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFVX vs RMEBX
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LDFVX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity A
Price$17.24
Change-$0.20 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.13B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.91
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
LDFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LDFVX (2.13B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LDFVX: RMEBX (1.05) vs LDFVX (0.74). LDFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LDFVX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LDFVX (0.95). LDFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LDFVX: RMEBX (250) vs LDFVX (1500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.55 vs. LDFVX (5.45). RMEBX (53.80) and LDFVX (51.95) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LDFVX | RMEBX | LDFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.07 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.727 | 14.940 | 105% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.13B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 1.05 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.45 | 6.55 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.67 | 30.03 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.95 | 53.80 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.83 | 92.20 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement