Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFOX vs RMEBX
LDFOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LDFOX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F3
Price$17.04
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.18B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.63
Change+$0.22 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LDFOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFOX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LDFOX (2.18B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LDFOX: RMEBX (1.10) vs LDFOX (0.73). LDFOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LDFOX (9 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LDFOX (0.63). LDFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LDFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LDFOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.20 vs. LDFOX (9.23). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.18 vs. LDFOX (39.56).
| LDFOX | RMEBX | LDFOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.097 | 2.096 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 1.10 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.23 | 11.20 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.14 | 27.52 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.56 | 43.18 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 108.13 | - |