Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFOX vs RMEBX
LDFOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LDFOX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F3
Price$17.28
Change+$0.09 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.19B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.84
Change+$0.35 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LDFOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFOX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LDFOX (2.19B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LDFOX: RMEBX (1.08) vs LDFOX (0.71). LDFOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LDFOX (9 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LDFOX (0.63). LDFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). LDFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LDFOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. LDFOX (6.64). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.15 vs. LDFOX (40.12).
| LDFOX | RMEBX | LDFOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.996 | 2.231 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.19B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.08 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | 7.30 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.83 | 28.21 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.12 | 43.15 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.95 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement