Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFOX vs RMEBX
LDFOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LDFOX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F3
Price$17.82
Change+$0.08 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.12B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.62
Change+$0.14 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.07B
LDFOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFOX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LDFOX (2.12B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LDFOX: RMEBX (1.05) vs LDFOX (0.94). LDFOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LDFOX (9 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LDFOX (0.63). LDFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LDFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LDFOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.55 vs. LDFOX (5.88). LDFOX (54.13) and RMEBX (53.80) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LDFOX | RMEBX | LDFOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.091 | 14.940 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.12B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 1.05 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.88 | 6.55 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.84 | 30.03 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.13 | 53.80 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers