Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LDFOX vs RMEBX
LDFOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LDFOX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F3
Price$16.91
Change+$0.04 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.17B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.71
Change+$0.23 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LDFOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LDFOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LDFOX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LDFOX (2.17B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LDFOX: RMEBX (1.03) vs LDFOX (0.00). LDFOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LDFOX (9 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LDFOX (0.63). LDFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LDFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LDFOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LDFOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.75 vs. RMEBX (7.97). RMEBX (45.21) and LDFOX (44.56) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LDFOX | RMEBX | LDFOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.07 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.163 | 9.599 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.17B | 112B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.03 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.75 | 7.97 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.99 | 28.41 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.56 | 45.21 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement