Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCTD vs SCHF
LCTD vs SCHF Comparison
Open Charts LCTD vs SCHF
iShares Wld ex USCrbTrnstnRdnssAwrActETF
Price$57.31
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
Volume$165
Net Assets237.19M
Schwab International Equity ETF™
Price$25.65
Change-$0.02 (-0.08%)
Volume$299
Net Assets58.43B
LCTD vs SCHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCTD vs. SCHF commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCTD is a Buy and SCHF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHF has more net assets: 58.4B vs. LCTD (237M). SCHF has a higher annual dividend yield than LCTD: SCHF (6.780) vs LCTD (4.921). LCTD was incepted earlier than SCHF: LCTD (5 years) vs SCHF (16 years). SCHF (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than LCTD (0.22). LCTD has a higher turnover SCHF (4.00) vs SCHF (4.00).
| LCTD | SCHF | LCTD / SCHF | |
| Gain YTD | 4.921 | 6.780 | 73% |
| Net Assets | 237M | 58.4B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.22 | 0.03 | 733% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 4.00 | 975% |
| Yield | 3.45 | 3.21 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LCTD | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 79% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LCTD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LCTD has been closely correlated with SAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LCTD jumps, then SAN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LCTD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCTD | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| SAN - LCTD | 70% Closely correlated | -6.36% | ||
| BN - LCTD | 70% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| MFC - LCTD | 69% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| NWG - LCTD | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| BAM - LCTD | 63% Loosely correlated | -6.68% | ||
More | ||||
SCHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHF | 100% | +0.23% | ||
| STM - SCHF | 79% Closely correlated | -3.16% | ||
| SAN - SCHF | 76% Closely correlated | -6.36% | ||
| BN - SCHF | 70% Closely correlated | -4.21% | ||
| BBVA - SCHF | 69% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| MFC - SCHF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
More | ||||