Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCSSX vs PEMGX
LCSSX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts LCSSX vs PEMGX
LCSSX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCSSX vs. PEMGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCSSX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. LCSSX (3.58B). LCSSX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . LCSSX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: LCSSX (13 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). LCSSX (0.98) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). LCSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCSSX: PEMGX (1000) vs LCSSX (1000000). LCSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.21 vs. PEMGX (-6.81). LCSSX return over 5 years is better than : 36.04 vs. PEMGX (28.44).
| LCSSX | PEMGX | LCSSX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.91 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.91 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.216 | 1.197 | 436% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.58B | 32B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.21 | -6.81 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.81 | 34.36 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.04 | 28.44 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 283.32 | 98.03 | 289% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers