Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCMNX vs RIEBX
LCMNX vs RIEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCMNX vs RIEBX
Miller Income C
Price$9.34
Change+$0.09 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets179.88M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2E
Price$27.17
Change+$0.06 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.15B
LCMNX vs RIEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCMNX vs. RIEBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCMNX is a Buy and RIEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIEBX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. LCMNX (180M). LCMNX pays higher dividends than RIEBX: LCMNX (3.33) vs RIEBX (3.16). LCMNX was incepted earlier than RIEBX: LCMNX (12 years) vs RIEBX (11 years). LCMNX (2.13) is less costly to investors than RIEBX (1.07). RIEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. LCMNX (38.00). RIEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCMNX: RIEBX (250) vs LCMNX (1000). LCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.67 vs. RIEBX (10.94). LCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 77.81 vs. RIEBX (36.84).
| LCMNX | RIEBX | LCMNX / RIEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 1.07 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 1.07 | 199% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.212 | 12.837 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 180M | 137B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.33 | 3.16 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.67 | 10.94 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.47 | 28.31 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.81 | 36.84 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.59 | 54.72 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement