Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCMGX vs NRGSX
LCMGX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts LCMGX vs NRGSX
Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth C
Price$21.89
Change-$1.02 (-4.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.26M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$61.95
Change-$0.68 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.43B
LCMGX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCMGX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCMGX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.43B vs. LCMGX (198M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than LCMGX: NRGSX (0.07) vs LCMGX (0.00). LCMGX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: LCMGX (5 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). LCMGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). LCMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCMGX: NRGSX (0) vs LCMGX (1500). LCMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. NRGSX (-13.93). LCMGX return over 5 years is better than : -1.12 vs. NRGSX (-6.57).
| LCMGX | NRGSX | LCMGX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.74 | 288% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.74 | 288% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.827 | -4.162 | -236% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 198M | 8.43B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.71 | -13.93 | -55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.21 | -1.73 | -2,319% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.12 | -6.57 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 10.77 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers