Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCIAX vs RWEBX
LCIAX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCIAX vs RWEBX
SEI Large Cap Index A (SIIT)
Price$212.76
Change+$0.94 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.83B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$64.88
Change+$0.26 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.03B
LCIAX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCIAX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCIAX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. LCIAX (1.83B). LCIAX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: LCIAX (1.20) vs RWEBX (0.80). LCIAX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LCIAX (23 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than LCIAX (0.13). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. LCIAX (12.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCIAX: RWEBX (250) vs LCIAX (100000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.72 vs. LCIAX (5.84). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.49 vs. LCIAX (30.33).
| LCIAX | RWEBX | LCIAX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.13 | 1.06 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.238 | 6.518 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.83B | 204B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.80 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.84 | 8.72 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.75 | 29.74 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.33 | 50.49 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.01 | 66.74 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement