Advertisement
LCHD vs TRUG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCHD is a Hold and TRUG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LCHD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRUG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LCHD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TRUG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LCHD’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRUG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LCHD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TRUG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
LCHD (@Packaged Software) experienced а -18.22% price change this week, while TRUG (@Recreational Products) price change was +3.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +75.80%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.17%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.37% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Recreational Products (+0.76% weekly)The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
| LCHD | TRUG | LCHD / TRUG | |
| Capitalization | 5.05M | 2.94M | 172% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -2.29M | - |
| Gain YTD | -68.571 | -93.595 | 73% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 22.7M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 13.7M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 8.32M | - |
LCHD | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LCHD | TRUG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 38% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 46% | 5 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 40% | 5 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 39% | 5 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 33% | 5 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
LCHD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LCHD and KNAMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LCHD and KNAMF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LCHD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCHD | 100% | N/A | ||
| KNAMF - LCHD | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TRUG - LCHD | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.87% | ||
| ZETA - LCHD | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.25% | ||
| YMM - LCHD | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
| DOCS - LCHD | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
More | ||||
TRUG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRUG has been loosely correlated with PEGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRUG jumps, then PEGA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRUG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRUG | 100% | -4.87% | ||
| PEGA - TRUG | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.22% | ||
| CALX - TRUG | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.48% | ||
| BASE - TRUG | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| VERI - TRUG | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.85% | ||
| DASTY - TRUG | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.03% | ||
More | ||||