Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCGFX vs RGACX
LCGFX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts LCGFX vs RGACX
William Blair Large Cap Growth I
Price$32.72
Change-$0.05 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.88B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
LCGFX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCGFX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCGFX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. LCGFX (2.88B). RGACX pays higher dividends than LCGFX: RGACX (0.07) vs LCGFX (0.06). LCGFX was incepted earlier than RGACX: LCGFX (26 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than LCGFX (0.75). LCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCGFX: RGACX (250) vs LCGFX (500000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. LCGFX (12.12). LCGFX return over 5 years is better than : 69.55 vs. RGACX (41.95).
| LCGFX | RGACX | LCGFX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.94 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.94 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.558 | 14.044 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.88B | 329B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.07 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.12 | 14.08 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.70 | 41.19 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.55 | 41.95 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 177.87 | 83.68 | 213% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement