LCFY
Price
$5.13
Change
+$0.14 (+2.81%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
7.09M
SNAP
Price
$7.65
Change
-$0.11 (-1.42%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
12.93B
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LCFY vs SNAP

Header iconLCFY vs SNAP Comparison
Open Charts LCFY vs SNAPBanner chart's image
Locafy
Price$5.13
Change+$0.14 (+2.81%)
Volume$42.54K
Capitalization7.09M
Snap
Price$7.65
Change-$0.11 (-1.42%)
Volume$37.67M
Capitalization12.93B
LCFY vs SNAP Comparison Chart in %
LCFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LCFY vs. SNAP commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCFY is a Hold and SNAP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (LCFY: $5.13 vs. SNAP: $7.65)
Brand notoriety: LCFY: Not notable vs. SNAP: Notable
Both companies represent the Internet Software/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LCFY: 6% vs. SNAP: 36%
Market capitalization -- LCFY: $7.09M vs. SNAP: $12.93B
LCFY [@Internet Software/Services] is valued at $7.09M. SNAP’s [@Internet Software/Services] market capitalization is $12.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $3.07T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $82.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LCFY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSNAP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LCFY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SNAP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LCFY is a better buy in the long-term than SNAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LCFY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNAP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LCFY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SNAP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SNAP is a better buy in the short-term than LCFY.

Price Growth

LCFY (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а +3.22% price change this week, while SNAP (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -1.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

SNAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Software/Services (-0.36% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNAP($12.9B) has a higher market cap than LCFY($7.09M). LCFY YTD gains are higher at: -25.328 vs. SNAP (-28.969). LCFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -596.6K vs. SNAP (-297.84M). SNAP has more cash in the bank: 2.89B vs. LCFY (409K). LCFY has less debt than SNAP: LCFY (573K) vs SNAP (4.19B). SNAP has higher revenues than LCFY: SNAP (5.64B) vs LCFY (3.85M).
LCFYSNAPLCFY / SNAP
Capitalization7.09M12.9B0%
EBITDA-596.6K-297.84M0%
Gain YTD-25.328-28.96987%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue3.85M5.64B0%
Total Cash409K2.89B0%
Total Debt573K4.19B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SNAP: Fundamental Ratings
SNAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
67
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LCFYSNAP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LCFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTNQ78.010.56
+0.72%
Pacer Trendpilot™ 100 ETF
TMB25.820.01
+0.04%
Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF
MDEV20.37N/A
N/A
First Trust Indxx Global Mdcl Dvcs ETF
AMZY13.73-0.08
-0.58%
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
KGRN29.64-0.71
-2.34%
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Tech ETF

LCFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LCFY and FENG have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LCFY and FENG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LCFY
1D Price
Change %
LCFY100%
+2.81%
FENG - LCFY
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.58%
SNAP - LCFY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
TRUE - LCFY
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.66%
JFIN - LCFY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
SOGP - LCFY
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.18%
More

SNAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNAP has been loosely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNAP jumps, then META could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNAP
1D Price
Change %
SNAP100%
-1.42%
META - SNAP
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
IAC - SNAP
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
YELP - SNAP
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
NRDS - SNAP
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
Z - SNAP
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.42%
More