LCFY
Price
$3.98
Change
-$0.10 (-2.45%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
6.25M
SNAP
Price
$8.27
Change
+$0.07 (+0.85%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
18.95B
51 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LCFY vs SNAP

Header iconLCFY vs SNAP Comparison
Open Charts LCFY vs SNAPBanner chart's image
Locafy
Price$3.98
Change-$0.10 (-2.45%)
Volume$2.89K
Capitalization6.25M
Snap
Price$8.27
Change+$0.07 (+0.85%)
Volume$26.37M
Capitalization18.95B
LCFY vs SNAP Comparison Chart
Loading...
LCFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LCFY vs. SNAP commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCFY is a Hold and SNAP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (LCFY: $4.02 vs. SNAP: $8.34)
Brand notoriety: LCFY: Not notable vs. SNAP: Notable
Both companies represent the Internet Software/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LCFY: 25% vs. SNAP: 52%
Market capitalization -- LCFY: $6.25M vs. SNAP: $18.95B
LCFY [@Internet Software/Services] is valued at $6.25M. SNAP’s [@Internet Software/Services] market capitalization is $18.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $1.94T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $67.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LCFY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSNAP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LCFY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SNAP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LCFY is a better buy in the long-term than SNAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LCFY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNAP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LCFY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SNAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SNAP is a better buy in the short-term than LCFY.

Price Growth

LCFY (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а -12.92% price change this week, while SNAP (@Internet Software/Services) price change was +0.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

SNAP is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Software/Services (+2.13% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNAP($18.9B) has a higher market cap than LCFY($6.25M). SNAP YTD gains are higher at: -22.563 vs. LCFY (-41.438). LCFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.86M vs. SNAP (-1.1B). SNAP has more cash in the bank: 3.54B vs. LCFY (611K). LCFY has less debt than SNAP: LCFY (730K) vs SNAP (4.35B). SNAP has higher revenues than LCFY: SNAP (4.61B) vs LCFY (5.27M).
LCFYSNAPLCFY / SNAP
Capitalization6.25M18.9B0%
EBITDA-5.86M-1.1B1%
Gain YTD-41.438-22.563184%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue5.27M4.61B0%
Total Cash611K3.54B0%
Total Debt730K4.35B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SNAP: Fundamental Ratings
SNAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
62
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
44

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LCFYSNAP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LCFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL200.420.21
+0.10%
Apple
SPY587.73-3.42
-0.58%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X107802.330000-1192.312500
-1.09%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA356.90-5.99
-1.65%
Tesla
GME31.21-3.80
-10.85%
GameStop Corp

LCFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LCFY and ZH have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LCFY and ZH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LCFY
1D Price
Change %
LCFY100%
-4.21%
ZH - LCFY
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.25%
SNAP - LCFY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
FENG - LCFY
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.41%
ONFO - LCFY
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.69%
SEAT - LCFY
11%
Poorly correlated
-5.95%
More

SNAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNAP has been loosely correlated with PINS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNAP jumps, then PINS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNAP
1D Price
Change %
SNAP100%
-0.95%
PINS - SNAP
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
META - SNAP
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
GOOG - SNAP
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
GOOGL - SNAP
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
IAC - SNAP
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
More