Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCFLX vs RWEBX
LCFLX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCFLX vs RWEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value C
Price$15.72
Change+$0.86 (+5.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.11M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.66
Change-$1.07 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
LCFLX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCFLX vs. RWEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCFLX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. LCFLX (111M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than LCFLX: RWEBX (0.78) vs LCFLX (0.00). LCFLX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LCFLX (7 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LCFLX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LCFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCFLX: RWEBX (250) vs LCFLX (1500). LCFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.50 vs. RWEBX (4.66). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.53 vs. LCFLX (-2.10).
| LCFLX | RWEBX | LCFLX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.06 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 1.06 | 225% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.947 | 1.452 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.78 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.50 | 4.66 | 333% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.18 | 27.48 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.10 | 33.53 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement