Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCFLX vs RWEBX
LCFLX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCFLX vs RWEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value C
Price$15.04
Change-$0.15 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets87.47M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.38
Change-$0.95 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.34B
LCFLX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCFLX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCFLX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. LCFLX (87.5M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than LCFLX: RWEBX (0.76) vs LCFLX (0.00). LCFLX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LCFLX (6 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LCFLX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LCFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCFLX: RWEBX (250) vs LCFLX (1500). LCFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.88 vs. RWEBX (4.46). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.13 vs. LCFLX (3.08).
| LCFLX | RWEBX | LCFLX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.06 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 1.06 | 225% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.936 | 10.741 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 87.5M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.76 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.88 | 4.46 | 244% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.12 | 29.97 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.08 | 43.13 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement