Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCFLX vs RMFCX
LCFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LCFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value C
Price$15.45
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.42M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.35
Change+$0.23 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LCFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCFLX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LCFLX (83.4M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LCFLX: RMFCX (1.18) vs LCFLX (0.00). LCFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LCFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LCFLX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LCFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCFLX: RMFCX (250) vs LCFLX (1500). LCFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.40 vs. RMFCX (8.05). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.17 vs. LCFLX (2.18).
| LCFLX | RMFCX | LCFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.91 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 0.91 | 263% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.938 | 9.696 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 83.4M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.18 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.40 | 8.05 | 216% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.94 | 28.89 | 207% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.18 | 46.17 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement