Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCFLX vs RMFCX
LCFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LCFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value C
Price$14.83
Change+$0.12 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.23M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
LCFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCFLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LCFLX (58.2M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LCFLX: RMFCX (1.24) vs LCFLX (0.00). LCFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LCFLX (6 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LCFLX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LCFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCFLX: RMFCX (250) vs LCFLX (1500). LCFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.23 vs. RMFCX (7.71). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.41 vs. LCFLX (9.67).
| LCFLX | RMFCX | LCFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.91 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 0.91 | 263% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.165 | 11.421 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.2M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.23 | 7.71 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.69 | 32.16 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.67 | 56.41 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement