Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCFLX vs RMEBX
LCFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value C
Price$14.83
Change+$0.12 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.23M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
LCFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCFLX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LCFLX (58.2M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LCFLX: RMEBX (1.09) vs LCFLX (0.00). LCFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LCFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LCFLX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LCFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCFLX: RMEBX (250) vs LCFLX (1500). LCFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.23 vs. RMEBX (7.45). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.11 vs. LCFLX (9.67).
| LCFLX | RMEBX | LCFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.07 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 1.07 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.165 | 11.179 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.2M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.23 | 7.45 | 231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.69 | 31.44 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.67 | 55.11 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement