Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCFLX vs RMEBX
LCFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value C
Price$15.72
Change+$0.86 (+5.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.11M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.49
Change-$1.74 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LCFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCFLX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LCFLX (111M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LCFLX: RMEBX (1.08) vs LCFLX (0.00). LCFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LCFLX (7 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LCFLX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LCFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCFLX: RMEBX (250) vs LCFLX (1500). LCFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.50 vs. RMEBX (7.30). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.15 vs. LCFLX (-2.10).
| LCFLX | RMEBX | LCFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.07 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 1.07 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.947 | 2.231 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.50 | 7.30 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.18 | 28.21 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.10 | 43.15 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.95 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement