Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCFLX vs RMEBX
LCFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value C
Price$15.69
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.17M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.41
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LCFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCFLX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LCFLX (99.2M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LCFLX: RMEBX (1.10) vs LCFLX (0.00). LCFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LCFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LCFLX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LCFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCFLX: RMEBX (250) vs LCFLX (1500). LCFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.32 vs. RMEBX (11.20). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.18 vs. LCFLX (-1.81).
| LCFLX | RMEBX | LCFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.07 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 1.07 | 223% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.750 | 2.096 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.2M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.32 | 11.20 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.43 | 27.52 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.81 | 43.18 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 108.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement