Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCF vs RECS
LCF vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts LCF vs RECS
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF
Price$42.51
Change-$0.39 (-0.91%)
Volume$768
Net Assets56.65M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$41.24
Change-$0.17 (-0.41%)
Volume$470.82K
Net Assets4.95B
LCF vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCF vs. RECS commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCF is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 4.95B vs. LCF (56.7M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than LCF: RECS (0.979) vs LCF (-0.090). LCF was incepted earlier than RECS: LCF (3 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than LCF (0.56). RECS has a higher turnover LCF (7.00) vs LCF (7.00).
| LCF | RECS | LCF / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -0.090 | 0.979 | -9% |
| Net Assets | 56.7M | 4.95B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.15 | 373% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 49.00 | 14% |
| Yield | 0.55 | 0.79 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LCF | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LCF has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LCF jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCF | 100% | -0.91% | ||
| GS - LCF | 71% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| AMZN - LCF | 66% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| AAPL - LCF | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| META - LCF | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| DD - LCF | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.06% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -3.06% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.40% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.63% | ||
More | ||||