Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCF vs RECS
LCF vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts LCF vs RECS
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF
Price$41.59
Change+$0.47 (+1.14%)
Volume$100
Net Assets52.45M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$40.46
Change+$0.48 (+1.20%)
Volume$1.97K
Net Assets4.1B
LCF vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCF vs. RECS commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCF is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 4.1B vs. LCF (52.4M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than LCF: RECS (15.482) vs LCF (12.906). LCF was incepted earlier than RECS: LCF (3 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than LCF (0.56). RECS has a higher turnover LCF (7.00) vs LCF (7.00).
| LCF | RECS | LCF / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 12.906 | 15.482 | 83% |
| Net Assets | 52.4M | 4.1B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.15 | 373% |
| Turnover | 7.00 | 49.00 | 14% |
| Yield | 0.55 | 0.60 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LCF | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 87% | 19 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 60% | 11 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LCF has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LCF jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GS - LCF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| DD - LCF | 67% Closely correlated | +1.84% | ||
| AAPL - LCF | 67% Closely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| AMZN - LCF | 67% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| META - LCF | 66% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.18% | ||
More | ||||