Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBSX vs PMAQX
LCBSX vs PMAQX Comparison
Open Charts LCBSX vs PMAQX
LCBSX vs PMAQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBSX vs. PMAQX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBSX is a StrongBuy and PMAQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMAQX has more cash in the bank: 31.2B vs. LCBSX (3.59B). PMAQX pays higher dividends than LCBSX: PMAQX (0.19) vs LCBSX (0.00). LCBSX was incepted earlier than PMAQX: LCBSX (13 years) vs PMAQX (9 years). LCBSX (1.37) is less costly to investors than PMAQX (0.59). LCBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. PMAQX (10.50). LCBSX (0) and PMAQX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LCBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. PMAQX (-4.15). LCBSX return over 5 years is better than : 23.91 vs. PMAQX (22.45).
| LCBSX | PMAQX | LCBSX / PMAQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.59 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.59 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.722 | -2.218 | -393% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.59B | 31.2B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.19 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | -4.15 | -144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.21 | 40.63 | 158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.91 | 22.45 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 294.73 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement