Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBSX vs PEMGX
LCBSX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts LCBSX vs PEMGX
LCBSX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBSX vs. PEMGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBSX is a Buy and PEMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 33.1B vs. LCBSX (3.63B). LCBSX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . LCBSX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: LCBSX (13 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). LCBSX (1.37) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). LCBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). LCBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PEMGX: LCBSX (0) vs PEMGX (1000). LCBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.23 vs. PEMGX (9.01). LCBSX (48.09) and PEMGX (46.31) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LCBSX | PEMGX | LCBSX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.91 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.91 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.974 | 6.969 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.63B | 33.1B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.23 | 9.01 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.29 | 45.42 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.09 | 46.31 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 280.93 | 108.18 | 260% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers