Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBSX vs PEMGX
LCBSX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts LCBSX vs PEMGX
LCBSX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBSX vs. PEMGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBSX is a Hold and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 32B vs. LCBSX (3.58B). LCBSX (0.00) and PEMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . LCBSX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: LCBSX (13 years) vs PEMGX (20 years). LCBSX (1.37) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). LCBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. PEMGX (10.50). LCBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PEMGX: LCBSX (0) vs PEMGX (1000). LCBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.50 vs. PEMGX (-5.01). LCBSX return over 5 years is better than : 36.55 vs. PEMGX (30.49).
| LCBSX | PEMGX | LCBSX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.91 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.91 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.346 | 2.816 | 261% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.58B | 32B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.50 | -5.01 | -70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.29 | 34.17 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.55 | 30.49 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.99 | 103.52 | 270% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement