Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCBDX vs RWEBX
LCBDX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCBDX vs RWEBX
ClearBridge Tactical Dividend Income IS
Price$25.60
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets358.48M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.39
Change+$0.15 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
LCBDX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LCBDX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jan 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LCBDX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. LCBDX (358M). LCBDX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: LCBDX (3.36) vs RWEBX (0.79). LCBDX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LCBDX (13 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LCBDX (1.07) and RWEBX (1.06) have similar cost to investors . LCBDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCBDX: RWEBX (250) vs LCBDX (1000000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. LCBDX (7.83). LCBDX return over 5 years is better than : 67.42 vs. RWEBX (35.31).
| LCBDX | RWEBX | LCBDX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.06 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.06 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.441 | 2.580 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 358M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.36 | 0.79 | 423% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.83 | 10.51 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.08 | 29.23 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.42 | 35.31 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.75 | 96.18 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement