Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCAGX vs REEBX
LCAGX vs REEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCAGX vs REEBX
Lord Abbett International Growth C
Price$16.74
Change-$0.32 (-1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.98M
American Funds EUPAC R2E
Price$64.44
Change-$1.11 (-1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.83B
LCAGX vs REEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REEBX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. LCAGX (3.98M). REEBX pays higher dividends than LCAGX: REEBX (0.39) vs LCAGX (0.00). LCAGX was incepted earlier than REEBX: LCAGX (4 years) vs REEBX (11 years). LCAGX (10.12) is less costly to investors than REEBX (1.27). LCAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 125.00 vs. REEBX (35.00). REEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCAGX: REEBX (250) vs LCAGX (1500). LCAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.21 vs. REEBX (16.64).
| LCAGX | REEBX | LCAGX / REEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.27 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.12 | 1.27 | 797% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.626 | 24.265 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.98M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.21 | 16.64 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.83 | 35.51 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 8.35 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement