Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCAGX vs REEBX
LCAGX vs REEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCAGX vs REEBX
Lord Abbett International Growth C
Price$16.18
Change+$0.06 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.67M
American Funds EUPAC R2E
Price$61.08
Change+$0.36 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.22B
LCAGX vs REEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REEBX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. LCAGX (3.67M). REEBX pays higher dividends than LCAGX: REEBX (0.43) vs LCAGX (0.00). LCAGX was incepted earlier than REEBX: LCAGX (4 years) vs REEBX (11 years). LCAGX (10.12) is less costly to investors than REEBX (1.27). LCAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. REEBX (35.00). REEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCAGX: REEBX (250) vs LCAGX (1500). LCAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.32 vs. REEBX (7.65).
| LCAGX | REEBX | LCAGX / REEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.27 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.12 | 1.27 | 797% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.146 | 15.791 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.67M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.32 | 7.65 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.09 | 23.24 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 10.59 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 28.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement