Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LCAGX vs REEBX
LCAGX vs REEBX Comparison
Open Charts LCAGX vs REEBX
Lord Abbett International Growth C
Price$16.71
Change+$0.06 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.01M
American Funds EUPAC R2E
Price$64.27
Change+$0.51 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.15B
LCAGX vs REEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REEBX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. LCAGX (4.01M). REEBX pays higher dividends than LCAGX: REEBX (0.39) vs LCAGX (0.00). LCAGX was incepted earlier than REEBX: LCAGX (4 years) vs REEBX (11 years). LCAGX (10.12) is less costly to investors than REEBX (1.27). LCAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 125.00 vs. REEBX (35.00). REEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LCAGX: REEBX (250) vs LCAGX (1500). LCAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.07 vs. REEBX (11.83).
| LCAGX | REEBX | LCAGX / REEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 1.27 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.12 | 1.27 | 797% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.723 | 20.645 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.01M | 134B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.39 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.07 | 11.83 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.61 | 28.18 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 38.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement