LC
Price
$16.64
Change
-$0.06 (-0.36%)
Updated
Sep 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.92B
27 days until earnings call
WAL
Price
$88.22
Change
-$0.80 (-0.90%)
Updated
Sep 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.83B
21 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LC vs WAL

Header iconLC vs WAL Comparison
Open Charts LC vs WALBanner chart's image
LendingClub
Price$16.64
Change-$0.06 (-0.36%)
Volume$11.37K
Capitalization1.92B
Western Alliance Ban
Price$88.22
Change-$0.80 (-0.90%)
Volume$10.4K
Capitalization9.83B
LC vs WAL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LC vs. WAL commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LC is a Hold and WAL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (LC: $16.70 vs. WAL: $89.02)
Brand notoriety: LC and WAL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LC: 69% vs. WAL: 52%
Market capitalization -- LC: $1.92B vs. WAL: $9.83B
LC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.92B. WAL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $9.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $165.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWAL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WAL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WAL is a better buy in the long-term than LC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WAL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LC and WAL are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.02% price change this week, while WAL (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

LC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

WAL is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.60% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WAL($9.83B) has a higher market cap than LC($1.92B). LC has higher P/E ratio than WAL: LC (26.09) vs WAL (11.70). WAL YTD gains are higher at: 7.050 vs. LC (3.150). WAL has more cash in the bank: 440M vs. LC (15.9M). LC has less debt than WAL: LC (22.4M) vs WAL (6.89B). WAL has higher revenues than LC: WAL (3.21B) vs LC (885M).
LCWALLC / WAL
Capitalization1.92B9.83B20%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.1507.05045%
P/E Ratio26.0911.70223%
Revenue885M3.21B28%
Total Cash15.9M440M4%
Total Debt22.4M6.89B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LC vs WAL: Fundamental Ratings
LC
WAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7383
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7862
SMR RATING
1..100
169
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5756
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WAL's Valuation (52) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LC (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that WAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than LC’s over the last 12 months.

WAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LC (78) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that WAL’s stock grew similarly to LC’s over the last 12 months.

WAL's SMR Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LC (16) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that WAL’s stock grew similarly to LC’s over the last 12 months.

LC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WAL (48) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LC’s stock grew similarly to WAL’s over the last 12 months.

WAL's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LC (57) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that WAL’s stock grew similarly to LC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LCWAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAFDX37.610.05
+0.13%
T. Rowe Price Equity Income Advisor
TSTRX21.77-0.06
-0.28%
Transamerica Stock Index R
ABINX20.94-0.07
-0.33%
American Century Balanced I
SIDRX13.20-0.05
-0.38%
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val SDR
GMJPX11.93-0.11
-0.91%
Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities P

LC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LC has been closely correlated with UMBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LC jumps, then UMBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LC
1D Price
Change %
LC100%
-2.51%
UMBF - LC
67%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
WAL - LC
66%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
KEY - LC
66%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
ASB - LC
66%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
CFG - LC
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
More

WAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WAL has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WAL jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WAL
1D Price
Change %
WAL100%
-0.90%
FNB - WAL
88%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
BKU - WAL
87%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
ASB - WAL
87%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
CFG - WAL
87%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
WBS - WAL
87%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
More