Advertisement
LC vs UMBF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LC is a Buy and UMBF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUMBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- UMBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UMBF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- UMBF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +7.45% price change this week, while UMBF (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.
Reported Earning Dates
LC is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2026.
UMBF is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.01% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| LC | UMBF | LC / UMBF | |
| Capitalization | 2.28B | 9.03B | 25% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.989 | 6.511 | 338% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.19 | 13.27 | 167% |
| Revenue | 950M | 2.16B | 44% |
| Total Cash | 15.9M | 1.09B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 19.1M | 252M | 8% |
LC | UMBF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 44 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 15 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UMBF's Valuation (56) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LC (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that UMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LC’s over the last 12 months.
UMBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LC (79) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that UMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LC’s over the last 12 months.
UMBF's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LC (15) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that UMBF’s stock grew similarly to LC’s over the last 12 months.
LC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as UMBF (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LC’s stock grew similarly to UMBF’s over the last 12 months.
UMBF's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LC (89) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that UMBF’s stock grew similarly to LC’s over the last 12 months.
| LC | UMBF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 15 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 63% |
Advertisement
LC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LC has been loosely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LC jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.
UMBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UMBF has been closely correlated with HWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UMBF jumps, then HWC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UMBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMBF | 100% | -0.26% | ||
| HWC - UMBF | 89% Closely correlated | -0.46% | ||
| FNB - UMBF | 89% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| ONB - UMBF | 88% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| TRMK - UMBF | 88% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| UBSI - UMBF | 88% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
More | ||||