Advertisement
LC vs OMCC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LC is a StrongBuy and OMCC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOMCC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- OMCC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMCC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- OMCC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.85% price change this week, while OMCC (@Savings Banks) price change was +6.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.73%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.73%.
Reported Earning Dates
LC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+0.72% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
@Savings Banks (-0.19% weekly)A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
| LC | OMCC | LC / OMCC | |
| Capitalization | 1.71B | 37.2M | 4,583% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.412 | -7.321 | 101% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.22 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 885M | 4.59M | 19,298% |
| Total Cash | 15.9M | 7.82M | 203% |
| Total Debt | 22.4M | 3.8M | 590% |
LC | OMCC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 16 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OMCC's Valuation (82) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as LC (100). This means that OMCC’s stock grew similarly to LC’s over the last 12 months.
LC's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OMCC (100). This means that LC’s stock grew similarly to OMCC’s over the last 12 months.
LC's SMR Rating (16) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for OMCC (93). This means that LC’s stock grew significantly faster than OMCC’s over the last 12 months.
LC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OMCC (56). This means that LC’s stock grew similarly to OMCC’s over the last 12 months.
OMCC's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LC (71). This means that OMCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LC’s over the last 12 months.
| LC | OMCC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 12 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 63% |
Advertisement
LC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LC has been closely correlated with UMBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LC jumps, then UMBF could also see price increases.
OMCC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OMCC and VSTS have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMCC and VSTS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OMCC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMCC | 100% | N/A | ||
| VSTS - OMCC | 30% Poorly correlated | -6.94% | ||
| SEZL - OMCC | 24% Poorly correlated | -34.32% | ||
| ALLY - OMCC | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.43% | ||
| UHAL - OMCC | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.53% | ||
| LC - OMCC | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.03% | ||
More | ||||