Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWIX vs RWMHX
LBWIX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LBWIX vs RWMHX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value I
Price$22.81
Change-$0.21 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.26M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.73
Change-$0.95 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.34B
LBWIX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWIX vs. RWMHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWIX is a StrongBuy and RWMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. LBWIX (95.3M). LBWIX pays higher dividends than RWMHX: LBWIX (1.56) vs RWMHX (1.33). LBWIX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LBWIX (15 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). LBWIX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LBWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWIX: RWMHX (250) vs LBWIX (1000000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.83 vs. LBWIX (-0.38). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.77 vs. LBWIX (37.23).
| LBWIX | RWMHX | LBWIX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.41 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.41 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.879 | 9.812 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.3M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.33 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.38 | 3.83 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.16 | 31.41 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.23 | 44.77 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement