Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWIX vs RWMHX
LBWIX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LBWIX vs RWMHX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value I
Price$22.51
Change+$0.21 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.43M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$67.17
Change+$0.53 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.71B
LBWIX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWIX vs. RWMHX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWIX is a StrongBuy and RWMHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. LBWIX (94.4M). LBWIX pays higher dividends than RWMHX: LBWIX (1.55) vs RWMHX (1.33). LBWIX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LBWIX (15 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). LBWIX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LBWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWIX: RWMHX (250) vs LBWIX (1000000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.99 vs. LBWIX (-1.03). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 49.64 vs. LBWIX (39.64).
| LBWIX | RWMHX | LBWIX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.41 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.41 | 215% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.333 | 9.663 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.4M | 207B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 1.33 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.03 | 3.99 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.46 | 41.40 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.64 | 49.64 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement