Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWIX vs RWEBX
LBWIX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWIX vs RWEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value I
Price$21.40
Change+$0.07 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.92M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.10
Change-$0.08 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
LBWIX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWIX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWIX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. LBWIX (98.9M). LBWIX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: LBWIX (1.52) vs RWEBX (0.79). LBWIX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LBWIX (15 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than LBWIX (0.88). LBWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWIX: RWEBX (250) vs LBWIX (1000000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.12 vs. LBWIX (7.08). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.86 vs. LBWIX (20.80).
| LBWIX | RWEBX | LBWIX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.06 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.06 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.392 | 2.132 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 98.9M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 0.79 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.08 | 9.12 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.91 | 28.67 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.80 | 35.86 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.41 | 95.32 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement