Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWIX vs RWEBX
LBWIX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWIX vs RWEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value I
Price$22.51
Change+$0.21 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.43M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.85
Change+$0.53 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.71B
LBWIX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWIX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWIX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. LBWIX (94.4M). LBWIX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: LBWIX (1.55) vs RWEBX (0.76). LBWIX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LBWIX (15 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than LBWIX (0.88). LBWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWIX: RWEBX (250) vs LBWIX (1000000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.29 vs. LBWIX (-1.03). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.88 vs. LBWIX (39.64).
| LBWIX | RWEBX | LBWIX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.06 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.06 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.333 | 9.079 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.4M | 207B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 0.76 | 204% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.03 | 3.29 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.46 | 38.78 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.64 | 45.88 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.59 | 73.45 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement