Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWIX vs RMFCX
LBWIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWIX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value I
Price$22.16
Change-$0.18 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.67M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.38
Change-$0.07 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
LBWIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LBWIX (96.7M). LBWIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBWIX (1.57) vs RMFCX (1.24). LBWIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWIX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) and LBWIX (0.88) have similar cost to investors . LBWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWIX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWIX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.71 vs. LBWIX (5.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.72 vs. LBWIX (42.79).
| LBWIX | RMFCX | LBWIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.91 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.634 | 11.292 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 96.7M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.24 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.14 | 8.71 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.62 | 28.01 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.79 | 56.72 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.62 | 92.34 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers