Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWIX vs RMFCX
LBWIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWIX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value I
Price$21.40
Change+$0.07 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.92M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.05
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LBWIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBWIX (98.9M). LBWIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBWIX (1.52) vs RMFCX (1.26). LBWIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWIX (15 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) and LBWIX (0.88) have similar cost to investors . LBWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWIX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWIX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.33 vs. LBWIX (7.08). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.17 vs. LBWIX (20.80).
| LBWIX | RMFCX | LBWIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.91 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.392 | 2.091 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 98.9M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 1.26 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.08 | 11.33 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.91 | 28.04 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.80 | 44.17 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.41 | 109.86 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement