Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWIX vs RMFCX
LBWIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWIX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value I
Price$22.81
Change-$0.21 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.26M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.57
Change-$0.70 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
LBWIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWIX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBWIX (95.3M). LBWIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LBWIX (1.56) vs RMFCX (1.21). LBWIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWIX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) and LBWIX (0.88) have similar cost to investors . LBWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWIX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWIX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. LBWIX (0.62). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.90 vs. LBWIX (38.49).
| LBWIX | RMFCX | LBWIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.91 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.91 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.928 | 15.093 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.3M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.21 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.62 | 6.67 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.84 | 30.56 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.49 | 54.90 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.64 | 94.04 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement