Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs VIVAX
LBWCX vs VIVAX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs VIVAX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$21.40
Change+$0.07 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.23M
Vanguard Value Index I
Price$70.47
Change+$0.29 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets195.18B
LBWCX vs VIVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. VIVAX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a StrongBuy and VIVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIVAX has more cash in the bank: 195B vs. LBWCX (94.2M). VIVAX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: VIVAX (2.06) vs LBWCX (0.69). LBWCX was incepted earlier than VIVAX: LBWCX (15 years) vs VIVAX (33 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than VIVAX (0.17). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. VIVAX (9.00). LBWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIVAX: LBWCX (1000) vs VIVAX (3000). VIVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.76 vs. LBWCX (3.11). VIVAX return over 5 years is better than : 74.87 vs. LBWCX (35.95).
| LBWCX | VIVAX | LBWCX / VIVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.17 | 1,118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.17 | 1,124% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.026 | 6.724 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.2M | 195B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 2.06 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.11 | 9.76 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.61 | 34.31 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.95 | 74.87 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.04 | 116.32 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers