Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs VIVAX
LBWCX vs VIVAX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs VIVAX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$21.25
Change+$0.12 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.34M
Vanguard Value Index I
Price$70.13
Change+$0.40 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets188.77B
LBWCX vs VIVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. VIVAX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Buy and VIVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIVAX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. LBWCX (93.3M). VIVAX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: VIVAX (2.06) vs LBWCX (0.69). LBWCX was incepted earlier than VIVAX: LBWCX (15 years) vs VIVAX (33 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than VIVAX (0.17). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. VIVAX (9.00). LBWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIVAX: LBWCX (1000) vs VIVAX (3000). VIVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.04 vs. LBWCX (6.36). VIVAX return over 5 years is better than : 80.14 vs. LBWCX (39.40).
| LBWCX | VIVAX | LBWCX / VIVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.17 | 1,118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.17 | 1,124% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.269 | 6.209 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 93.3M | 189B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 2.06 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.36 | 12.04 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.37 | 35.16 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.40 | 80.14 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.46 | 115.74 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement