Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs VIVAX
LBWCX vs VIVAX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs VIVAX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$21.46
Change-$0.12 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.76M
Vanguard Value Index I
Price$70.33
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets195.81B
LBWCX vs VIVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. VIVAX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Buy and VIVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIVAX has more cash in the bank: 196B vs. LBWCX (94.8M). VIVAX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: VIVAX (2.06) vs LBWCX (0.69). LBWCX was incepted earlier than VIVAX: LBWCX (15 years) vs VIVAX (33 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than VIVAX (0.17). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. VIVAX (9.00). LBWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIVAX: LBWCX (1000) vs VIVAX (3000). VIVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.90 vs. LBWCX (2.91). VIVAX return over 5 years is better than : 68.56 vs. LBWCX (31.76).
| LBWCX | VIVAX | LBWCX / VIVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.17 | 1,118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.17 | 1,124% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.329 | 6.512 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.8M | 196B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 2.06 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.91 | 7.90 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.49 | 25.93 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.76 | 68.56 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.01 | 114.64 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers