Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RWMHX
LBWCX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RWMHX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$21.87
Change+$0.11 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.99M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.64
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.87B
LBWCX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RWMHX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a StrongBuy and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. LBWCX (94M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RWMHX (1.33) vs LBWCX (0.65). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RWMHX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RWMHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.99 vs. LBWCX (-2.16). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 49.64 vs. LBWCX (32.18).
| LBWCX | RWMHX | LBWCX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.41 | 463% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.41 | 466% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.399 | 9.663 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94M | 206B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.33 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.16 | 3.99 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.29 | 41.40 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.18 | 49.64 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement