Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RWEBX
LBWCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RWEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$21.87
Change+$0.11 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.99M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.32
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.87B
LBWCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. LBWCX (94M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RWEBX (0.76) vs LBWCX (0.65). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RWEBX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.29 vs. LBWCX (-2.16). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.88 vs. LBWCX (32.18).
| LBWCX | RWEBX | LBWCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.06 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.06 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.399 | 9.079 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94M | 206B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.76 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.16 | 3.29 | -66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.29 | 38.78 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.18 | 45.88 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.62 | 73.45 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement