Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RWEBX
LBWCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RWEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$21.65
Change-$0.28 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.29M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$65.66
Change-$1.07 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
LBWCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. LBWCX (101M). LBWCX (0.78) and RWEBX (0.78) have matching dividends . LBWCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RWEBX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). LBWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.03 vs. RWEBX (4.66). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.53 vs. LBWCX (17.36).
| LBWCX | RWEBX | LBWCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.06 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.06 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.250 | 1.452 | 361% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.78 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.03 | 4.66 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.91 | 27.48 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.36 | 33.53 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.54 | 91.10 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement