Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RMFEX
LBWCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMFEX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$21.94
Change+$0.21 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.19M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.85
Change+$0.06 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
LBWCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LBWCX (97.2M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMFEX (1.49) vs LBWCX (0.66). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMFEX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.06 vs. LBWCX (3.58). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 58.84 vs. LBWCX (35.11).
| LBWCX | RMFEX | LBWCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.62 | 306% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.62 | 308% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.752 | 11.638 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.2M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.49 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.58 | 8.06 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.17 | 33.39 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.11 | 58.84 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.04 | 98.59 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers