Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RMFEX
LBWCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMFEX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$20.82
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.73M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.74
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LBWCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBWCX (97.7M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMFEX (1.43) vs LBWCX (0.64). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMFEX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.21 vs. LBWCX (3.63). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 48.39 vs. LBWCX (17.91).
| LBWCX | RMFEX | LBWCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.62 | 306% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.62 | 308% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.098 | 9.983 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.7M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 1.43 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.63 | 8.21 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.73 | 29.84 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.91 | 48.39 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.17 | 97.98 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers