Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RMFEX
LBWCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMFEX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$22.36
Change-$0.21 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.26M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.97
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
LBWCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBWCX (95.3M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMFEX (1.46) vs LBWCX (0.66). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMFEX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. LBWCX (-0.49). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.30 vs. LBWCX (31.18).
| LBWCX | RMFEX | LBWCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.62 | 306% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.62 | 308% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.932 | 15.396 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.3M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.46 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.49 | 7.02 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.00 | 31.78 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.18 | 57.30 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.40 | 101.84 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers