Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RMFEX
LBWCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMFEX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$21.87
Change+$0.11 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets93.99M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.89
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LBWCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LBWCX (94M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMFEX (1.46) vs LBWCX (0.65). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMFEX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.28 vs. LBWCX (-2.16). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 59.52 vs. LBWCX (32.18).
| LBWCX | RMFEX | LBWCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.62 | 306% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.62 | 308% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.399 | 13.941 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.46 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.16 | 5.28 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.29 | 40.09 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.18 | 59.52 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.62 | 98.84 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement