Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RMFCX
LBWCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$22.36
Change-$0.21 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.26M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.57
Change-$0.70 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
LBWCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBWCX (95.3M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMFCX (1.21) vs LBWCX (0.66). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. LBWCX (-0.49). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.90 vs. LBWCX (31.18).
| LBWCX | RMFCX | LBWCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.91 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.91 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.932 | 15.093 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.3M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.21 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.49 | 6.67 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.00 | 30.56 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.18 | 54.90 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.40 | 94.04 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement