Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RMFCX
LBWCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$20.82
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.73M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.36
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LBWCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBWCX (97.7M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMFCX (1.18) vs LBWCX (0.64). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. LBWCX (3.63). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.19 vs. LBWCX (17.91).
| LBWCX | RMFCX | LBWCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.91 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.91 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.098 | 9.715 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.7M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 1.18 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.63 | 7.94 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.73 | 28.72 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.91 | 46.19 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.17 | 90.34 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement