Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RMFCX
LBWCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$21.65
Change-$0.28 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.29M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.14
Change-$1.74 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LBWCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBWCX (101M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMFCX (1.24) vs LBWCX (0.78). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. LBWCX (5.03). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.16 vs. LBWCX (17.36).
| LBWCX | RMFCX | LBWCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.91 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.91 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.250 | 2.244 | 234% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 1.24 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.03 | 7.45 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.91 | 28.73 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.36 | 44.16 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.54 | 105.79 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement