Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RMFCX
LBWCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMFCX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$22.79
Change+$0.21 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.53M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.49
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LBWCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBWCX (96.5M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMFCX (1.18) vs LBWCX (0.64). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMFCX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.27 vs. LBWCX (-0.91). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.02 vs. LBWCX (28.72).
| LBWCX | RMFCX | LBWCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.91 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.91 | 210% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.043 | 15.500 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 96.5M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 1.18 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.91 | 6.27 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.09 | 27.68 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.72 | 52.02 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.87 | 90.44 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers