Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RMEBX
LBWCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$21.65
Change-$0.28 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.29M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.49
Change-$1.74 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LBWCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBWCX (101M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMEBX (1.08) vs LBWCX (0.78). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMEBX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.30 vs. LBWCX (5.03). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 43.15 vs. LBWCX (17.36).
| LBWCX | RMEBX | LBWCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.07 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.07 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.250 | 2.231 | 235% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 1.08 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.03 | 7.30 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.91 | 28.21 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.36 | 43.15 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.54 | 103.95 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement