Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RMEBX
LBWCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$20.82
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.73M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.72
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LBWCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBWCX (97.7M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMEBX (1.03) vs LBWCX (0.64). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMEBX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.85 vs. LBWCX (3.63). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.24 vs. LBWCX (17.91).
| LBWCX | RMEBX | LBWCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.07 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.07 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.098 | 9.617 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 97.7M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 1.03 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.63 | 7.85 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.73 | 28.25 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.91 | 45.24 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.17 | 88.81 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement