Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LBWCX vs RMEBX
LBWCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LBWCX vs RMEBX
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C
Price$22.79
Change+$0.21 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.53M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.83
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LBWCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LBWCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LBWCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LBWCX (96.5M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LBWCX: RMEBX (1.03) vs LBWCX (0.64). LBWCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LBWCX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LBWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LBWCX: RMEBX (250) vs LBWCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.12 vs. LBWCX (-0.91). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.92 vs. LBWCX (28.72).
| LBWCX | RMEBX | LBWCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.07 | 178% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 1.07 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.043 | 15.326 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 96.5M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 1.03 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.91 | 6.12 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.09 | 27.12 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.72 | 50.92 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.87 | 88.58 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement